David Miliband

GET UPDATES FROM David Miliband
 

It's the Economy

Posted: 22/07/11 01:00

David Cameron must be thinking that the hacking scandal is the worst thing to happen to his Premiership. He certainly still has some big questions to answer, as Ed has been pressing. But the Prime Minister may come to think that hacking is a welcome relief from answering questions about the economy - which in the last two to three weeks has produced figures showing all the vitality of a fatigued and ageing tortoise.

Call it basic but just look at the components of growth. Private consumption is depressed, not just by a few days off with the Royal Wedding, but by the substance of declining real wages and extra saving (the latter is one reason that it is foolish to argue that first quarter low growth cannot be blamed on Government policy, on the grounds that the squeeze hadn't really started; the truth is that the Government went out of its way last year to frighten the living daylights out of people, and succeeded, with the result that spending is depressed). Private sector investment is held back not by weak balance sheets - as I understand it corporate balance sheets are much stronger - but by the fact that there is little anticipation of demand, and there are bigger returns elsewhere, so big British corporates are investing elsewhere in the world. Meanwhile Government spending is being squeezed. And the trade balance has suddenly gone in the wrong direction according to the last figures. Throw in the inflationary problem and you have a mad cocktail.

The result is increasing concern about the next set of UK growth figures for the second quarter, and alarm about the future. Monday's Daily Telegraph said that the Government needed a growth strategy. The Times has been lamenting the lack of one for some time. It is a pity that these papers were cheering on deficit zealotry last summer. Nick Clegg's argument on Sunday on the Marr show - that Greece's problems show why the Government is right to eliminate the structural deficit in four years - is precisely wrong. Greece's problems show the danger of an austerity (plus European bailout) plan that has no growth plan. As I pointed out when the Tories first raised the Greek spectre in the General Election campaign, Britain has much longer maturity on its debts, much higher levels of domestic cover for borrowing, and much lower debt than Greece. Our danger is Japan style low growth for a decade, not the Greek problem.

The danger for Britain is set out in exemplary fashion in a brilliant testimony from June 2010 to the US Congress by Professor Richard C Koo of the Nomura Research Institute in Tokyo. He coins the idea of a "balance sheet recession" where the private sector - household and corporate - sets out to minimise its debts. He wrote: "Today, the US, UK, Spain, Portugal and Italy (but not Greece) are in serious balance sheet recessions with massive private sector deleveraging even with near zero interest rates... In all the above countries, increases in private sector savings during the last two years have exceeded increases in government borrowings, which suggest that governments are not doing enough. Yet policy makers spooked by what happened to Greece have made strong pushes to cut budget deficits as quickly as possible...only looking at increases in the [public] deficit while ignoring an even bigger increase in private sector savings. Removing government support in the midst of private sector deleveraging will repeat the Japanese mistake of premature fiscal consolidation in 1997 and 2001 which in both cases triggered a deflationary spiral and increased the deficit. The US made the same mistake of premature fiscal consolidation in 1937, with equally devastating results."

The problems in Europe are increasing and real. I said in Poland two months ago that the options were all the more costly than the previous year. They are worse now. And the insistence that there is no hurry to solve them only makes things worse still. A comprehensive resolution should address debts too big ever to be sorted out, bank balance sheets that are too weak, and the need for European shared endeavour that recognises Germany gets an undervalued exchange rate in return for taking the strain through, for example, Eurobonds and a growth strategy. The Tory argument that Britain would lead the way through exports was just talk. Government spending is not just about paying people to dig holes and fill them. It needs to recognise the scale of the productivity challenge and the role of public investment as a multiplier of and catalyst for private endeavour.

So as we head for summer, I think we need to look at whether under performance on growth is not just threatening living standards, but also threatening the fiscal targets that the government set last year. The very real possibility of missing the OBR growth forecasts by just an average 0.4% per year will make the target of any reduction in debt levels to GDP by the end of this Parliament impossible.

This is NOT deficit denial. It is a hard headed judgment about how fast you can reduce the deficit without killing off growth. The Government's logic - that deficit reduction itself is the spur to growth - is very odd. It is essentially saying that the way to expand the economy is to contract a big (government) part of it. As Larry Summers wrote, that is just perverse when there is no evidence of government spending crowding out private spending - "the notion of an expansionary fiscal contraction is every bit as oxymoronic as it sounds". Whatever the problems of government policy before the recession, the plan afterwards to halve the deficit in four years but continue to nurture and support private sector confidence with government contribution to growth was right and is needed today.

The Government may feel that the costs of retreat from Plan A are too great; but the costs of sticking to it could be greater.

This blog can also be read on David's website

 

Follow David Miliband on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dmiliband

 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:28 on 02/08/2011
I own and run a small business that's been going since 1995 and we employ 15 people (we were at 20). Not sure if we are a barometer. Got hit very hard in Oct 2008 following the crash. Managed to stabilise things by the Spring and then had a very strong 2009-10. Since the summer of 2010 (just after the election) things started to get worse again and the last 12 months have been like pushing the proverbial up hill. Customers are petrified and getting them to commit to spending money is tremendously difficult. All this means we will be paying less corporation tax next year and we have fewer staff contributing to PAYE. If my experience is typical then what the government is saving on the one hand (expenditure) it's losing on the other (tax receipts). No one seriously argues that we shouldn't tackle the deficit, but the four year target seems to me politically driven. Somehow we need to get some confidence back into the economy and constantly comparing our situation to that of Greece isn't helping.
photo
Sickofpoliticians2
here to pissuoff
10:04 on 24/07/2011
blame the tories, blame labour, blame the tories, blame labour, on and on it goes while the people of this country suffer regardless of which party rules the roost. For the last thirty years successive parties have busied themselves with petty arguing and point scoring while allowing the closure of British industry, if we make nothing, we have nothing to sell, it doesn't take anyone with the title "economist" or the brains of a rocket scientist to come to the conclusion that without production-jobs-income and the total reliance on financial institutions we are not going to resolve the situation we find ourselves in today. The wealth of this country came from our industries, those who closed or allowed the closures to happen (politicians) should be in the dock on charges of treason.
ThePeacemakers
Concerned Citizen
19:03 on 22/07/2011
The UK government spending will no more be cut in the long run than it will be in the USA.
It is a redirecting of spending that is occuring - to favored "friends" of the establishment.
11:36 on 22/07/2011
The sooner we get you back with your brother, Ed Balls, Gordon, Mandy and Bad Al Campbell, the sooner we can get the country back on its feet...at least I think that's what the IMF suggested.
16:33 on 22/07/2011
Is this meant to be a satire, or is Aaron D Highside completely Gaga
11:28 on 22/07/2011
Excellent article, David. Please see a very good article in new pamphlet published last week - Pragmatic Radicalism: Ideas from Labour's New Generation, by associate editor, Jonathan Todd - http://pragmaticradicalism.co.uk/addressing-the-challenges-of-rebalancing-the-economy - Addressing the challenges of rebalancing the economy.
10:12 on 22/07/2011
The assumption that we should be determined to engage in growth as vigorously as we can as soon as we can needs to be questioned. Over-rapid engagement in growth means what? Sucking in more imports so that retail can experience a mini-boom while consumers splurge themselves into another whack of debt. Is the aim to secure tens of thousands of jobs in nail shops, hairdressers, tattooists and chains of over-priced slave-driven, young-oriented fashion chains named after fruit not eaten by the lower classes?

During Japan's ''lost decade'' of stagnation, thousands of Japan's SME's contributing to export of manufactures, re-tooled and re-oriented themselves to gain market share in high end goods. Citing Japan's course as one to avoid can only be dome by ignoring much of what happens in that country.

Britain cannot pursue growth which will simply manifest itself in consumption. We need one of two things. Planned growth devoted to increasing productive capacity or a planned contraction of internal demand.

Labour during its time in government should have gone for the former - offering planned expansion of production - but instead constantly went for expansion of services.

The Conservatives are now pursuing demand reduction using cuts. It is easy to do, requires no thinking, and conforms with their attachment to free market philosophies.

The Conservatives can get away with their course of action because Labour were too lazy, too weak in leadership to take us down a more productive path.
17:29 on 22/07/2011
Your entire argument, while perfectly erudite, rests on equating growth with rising consumer spending. What we need is a rapid expansion of manufacturing, construction and business services. Labour strove towards this during its time in power but too halfheartedly, it was only after the recession hit that efforts really picked up. It's just a shame that the Tories undermined all their efforts for petty ideological reasons and their traditional disdain for industry.
17:53 on 22/07/2011
My argument does not rest upon equating growth with rising consumer spending. Please read again.

My argument is same as yours except I do not excuse Labour Party from their failure to expand manufacturing capacity during their period of government over a very prosperous decade. They blew it.
This comment has been removed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:40 on 22/07/2011
I suspect that if Labour was still in power and applying its economic plans we in the UK would not be concerned about what is happening in the Eurozone because the financial hellhounds would be at our door and the IMF would be demanding even more severe austerity measures than the present government proposes.
13:33 on 22/07/2011
I agree with you Orthrus. The UK austerity plan is severe but could be much worse. The markets have given the UK a soft ride since the cuts were announced. Without those, we'd have lost our AAA rating and would now be paying even more interest (already the same level as that of the entire defence budget). Labour's approach might in the immediate term weaken the impact on the high street but the country in the long term would be poorer, with higher taxes to pay for our interest payments and the likely consequential corporate exodus.
17:34 on 22/07/2011
We have never been close to losing our credit rating or defaulting on our debts, for various reasons many of which David addresses directly we're in a much better position than the Greeks, Irish etc. Remember we still have large stakes in some of the biggest and most profitable banks. If things ever got bad we could always engineer a share-sale early and use that to pay off the most urgent debts, not the most attractive situation but a nice fail-safe to have just in case the sky actually does fall in.
lastpost
see biography
05:47 on 22/07/2011
"declining real wages and extra saving" 
Governments require money. Savers require a secure repository for their reserves. Why not work together, and cut out the middle men?

"the truth is"
in the country’s account books. Maybe we could hire Indiana Jones to go look for them.

"as I understand it corporate balance sheets are much stronger"
which tends to suggest that I don’t actually understand "it" at all.

"you have a mad cocktail"
waving the peasant.

"balance sheet recession"
No matter what state an economy is in, there are certain unavoidable outlays. Food and fuel being two of them. What advancements in our methodology can we devise, enhance and encourage, that would optimise operations in those areas?

"The problems in Europe are increasing and real"
Conversely, their accounting system is complete fiction. I wonder if there's a connection.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediumal57
Moderate Extremist
04:18 on 22/07/2011
An economy is like any system - it's fragile and a delicately balanced process of competing forces. The problem that most governments have is reconciling these competing forces so that no single force gains dominance for any sustained period of time. The trouble is though - it aint easy, especially when government is idealogically driven. Nearly all economic trends are of some benefit to someone irrespective of what they are. Whether it's a credit rush based on escallating property prices; massive hikes in production of goods and servies that eventually overheats an economy when that productoion out-strips demand. All areas of an economy are prone if allowed, to get seriously out of kilter and will of course eventually come to a screaming halt or just peter out causing massive dislocation and the need to readjust.

That is what is esentially taking place at the moment. We've been gorging ourselves for far too long on cheap credit and so we are now having to take virtually an opposite approach. Personally I think the breaks have been applied too quickly and forcibly. There was no need to do this. The Tories are behaving like an overweight teenager having their stomach stapled up to avoid eating properly. They might argue for such drastic measures trying to convince us that there is bo alternative, But there is always an alternative.
03:52 on 22/07/2011
Well said David. It would be nice to hear more of these same kinds of arguments coming from elsewhere in the Labour party.
Hurry back. Ed's getting it together but Labour still needs its big beasts.
01:01 on 22/07/2011
I'm glad to see labour back in the centre and back on the front foot. Unfortunately the tories seem totally ignorant to Richard Koo's proof of the cause of our economic malaise and are intent on prolonging this agony. Hopefully this current govt wont last the full term so we can be shot of the coalition.
photo
wmnorton
Moderate where moderate used to be
00:44 on 22/07/2011
What facts have propven again that Reagans Voodo Economics doesn't work? Obviously they didn't apply it right or they would have seen huge increses in GDP. The fact that it has never worked is no reason to stop trying to make it work. Come on Republicans show us how it will work this time in the US. Don't base your actions on the fact that it has never worked, be sure of your convictions and your principles, and after all the president will not stand in your way.
00:40 on 22/07/2011
This is the most sensible piece i have seen written on our British economy for a long time. The fact is that the current Tory-led government's plan to eliminate the deficit in 4 years is totally extreme. When they say cutting back public spending to reduce the deficit, what they are actually doing when they do that is cut jobs in both private and public sectors and also taking so much money out of the economy which means it is even harder to get the deficit down. It is a myth that austerity is the main tool to getting a deficit down, it is true that it plays a role but it is jobs and 'Growth' that mainly get a deficit down as John Maynard Keynes tells us, and his words ring true today as they did back then all those years ago. On the plus side to what is happening in our economy now their has actually been over 500,000 jobs created, true a lot of them were and are part-time jobs but they are jobs never the less, and we can only hope and pray that George Osbornes corporation tax cutting plan will get more businesses to come to Britain and also for current one's to expand. I do think we will avoid a recession in this country but i fear the same as David Miliband does in his post that we will have sluggish growth for years to come.