Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr Aseem Malhotra

GET UPDATES FROM Dr Aseem Malhotra
 

If We Know Breast Is Best, Why Are We Allowing the Baby Food Industry to Get Away With 'Murder'?

Posted: 06/12/2012 00:04

On the eve of the World Breast Feeding Conference taking place in Delhi this weekend, a special international report released by the World Breastfeeding Trends initiative reveals some profoundly shocking and worrying statistics. The study of 51 countries, which makes up two thirds of the world's children, demonstrates that only 40% of children born in these countries were exclusively breast fed for the first six months as recommended by the World Health Organisation and UNICEF.

The science underpinning the importance of breast feeding has been well documented and cannot be overstated. In 2003 the Lancet published a series on child survival emphasising that exclusive breast feeding, if universalised, could save 13% of all under five deaths, (an estimated 1.3million in the 42 high mortality countries). Breast milk is a unique nutritional source that not only helps protect infants from infection, but is also extremely important for child brain development and the prevention of child obesity, hypertension and cardiac diseases in later life.

There are also tremendous health benefits for breast feeding mothers, who are less likely to develop osteoporosis, are able to lose weight gained during pregnancy more easily and are at a reduced risk of developing breast, uterine and ovarian cancer. But this is not just an issue confined to developing countries. The United Kingdom has one of the lowest rates of breast feeding in Europe with the latest statistics for England stating that while 73% of new mothers initiate breastfeeding the number rapidly declines to 45% by 6-8 weeks. Professor Mitch Blair, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health's Officer for Health Promotion says that "breastfeeding is the healthiest way to feed your baby for the first six months and is known to build a strong physical and emotional bond between mother and child. Research has shown that breastfed babies are less likely to get diarrhoea or vomit, have fewer chest and ear infections, and are less likely of becoming obese. If all UK infants were exclusively breastfed for six months, admissions to hospital due to diarrhoea would be halved and those due to respiratory infections would fall by a quarter."

It's important to recognise and be sensitive to the fact that for various reasons not all women will be able to breastfeed their babies exclusively for six months, but this should apply to a small minority, not the overwhelming majority. So what is the most important cause of this noncompliance which is resulting in hundreds of thousands of premature infant deaths and unspeakable suffering throughout the world? I believe it is the over promotion and aggressive unregulated marketing of baby food products to vulnerable young mothers that not only increases the acceptability of infant formula but is contributing to this significant disease burden including rocketing rates of child obesity.

Patti Rundall, director of Baby Milk Action UK, is particularly scathing of the industry. "The most irresponsible baby companies see malnutrition as a profitable business and the perfect cover for their ' top strategic priority' which is as it always has been - to change traditional food patterns and cultures, extend bottle-feeding for years on end and encourage everyone to snack on 'slightly better for you' junk foods all day long."

Profit is clearly a very powerful motivator even at the expense of children's health. The global baby foods and infant formula market is projected to reach a staggering 30billion US dollars by 2018, but as the report highlights there are also major gaps in policies to protect breastfeeding including weak implementation for the marketing of breast milk substitutes. Earlier this year one of India's leading paediatricians Dr Arun Gupta filed charges against Nestle for allegedly violating laws against the correct labelling of infant formula products and for associated failings regarding advertisements in women's magazines.

The report emphasises that although legislation surrounding breastfeeding practices in many of these countries exists, governments are either under resourced or toothless to implement them. Powerful financial institutions continue to profit at the expense of our health. There is often a conflict between politics, corporations and ethics. But without effective intervention it is the poor, our children and the most vulnerable members of society that will suffer the most and health inequalities will continue to widen. Let us hope the inspiring voices of health campaigners in Delhi this weekend serves as a rallying call to influence policymakers to make doubly sure that exclusive breastfeeding for six months is a human right for both women and infants.

 

Follow Dr Aseem Malhotra on Twitter: www.twitter.com/draseemmalhotra

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
On the eve of the World Breast Feeding Conference taking place in Delhi this weekend, a special international report released by the World Breastfeeding Trends initiative reveals some profoundly shock...
On the eve of the World Breast Feeding Conference taking place in Delhi this weekend, a special international report released by the World Breastfeeding Trends initiative reveals some profoundly shock...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:31 AM on 12/11/2012
In an impressive statistical analysis, Folden Palmer calculates that, of the 28,000 infant deaths in the US in 1999, the lives of 9,335 infants could have been saved if they had been breastfed.

This is taken from article on lactivist, infant-formula-baby-milk-ingredients-additives-and-contamination-info. The whole report is pretty damning when it comes to analysing the evidence.

It will still take many years to overturn the sales patter and social conditioning which has led to massive overuse of formula milk. Advertising standards have now changed. At one time clinics and midwives were paid to promote bottle-feeding.

If you read the article and the additives that are in it, it is quite shocking.

I breast fed for just over 2 years and am thankful to say my son NEVER had formula. He only vomited once in his first 2 years and was never ill.

I agree about the 'stigmatization' of breastfeeding in Western society. It is THE most natural act and we have much to do to make it 'socially acceptable' again. BUT we're up against the large multi-national corporations that have sold this stuff at the cost of human life.

Come on ladies, do everything possible to give your little ones the best start in life, don't be sold a LIE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ToniChicago
01:25 AM on 12/09/2012
"Murder" - really? I can only hope that this was an attempt at sensationalism and reader attraction. What next? Bringing non-breast-feeding mothers in, establishing their reasons for not breast-feeding (convenience versus medical) and then charging them with child neglect or attempted murder? It's bad enough that in many countries we're told how and when we must carry pregnancies to term, and now we're being told how our bodies should feed them.
I would love to see all this money spent on a more useful research project - like how men can become pregnant, give birth and breast feed. I think then you'll find that abortion becomes a sacrament and formula is handed out free to one and all.
01:05 PM on 12/10/2012
we in the rich west are free to choose. The problem is that many in developing countries have no access to clean water and sterilising units. Botlle feeding babies in such conditions does indeed kill them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:39 PM on 12/08/2012
By the way, what the formula multinationals did in the developing world is absolutely disgusting. That is a different issue all together. Lying and claiming that formula is somehow superior to breastmilk should be illegal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:33 PM on 12/08/2012
Yes, breastmilk is superior to formula.
But do you know what would save more lives that making all women breastfeed ("universalize" it, as you mentioned)? If everyone at an appropriate diet, exercised the proper amount, educated themselves consistently, knew and acted based on the knowledge of right and wrong, didn't do drugs, didn't have an protected sex, and were generally perfect.
But we aren't.
You can promote breastfeeding all you want, but you can't enforce it. People will choose what they wish to choose and demonizing them for their choice because they aren't perfect and don't necessarily make all the optimal decision just seems like a "throwing stones from a glass house" type thing
06:55 PM on 12/08/2012
Get real. A significant number of mother's struggle to make enough milk - my own sons were screaming with hunger within a month of being born, and bottle is VASTLY better than starvation. A well fed brain develops properly.
08:27 PM on 12/07/2012
The data is right, but the analysis is off. The bigger problem here is the social stigmatism of breastfeeding. How many men (or women) do you know that buy or fix their lunch and then go into a public bathroom stall and close the door so that they can be isolated while they eat it? Now how many do you know that suggest that the bathroom is the ONLY appropriate place to breastfeed outside the home? Amongst my own extended family, I was asked to either go to a private room or not come to the house at all. I was a total social pariah as long as I was a breastfeeding mother. Need to get shopping done? Forget it. It takes twice as long to take a baby along anyway - if you now can't breastfeed on the trip, you will only get 1/4 the shopping done before you have to "go hide" because of how disgusted people are that you would breastfeed (even covered) in public. Want to go for a walk? Forget it. Want to socialize and have some modicum of a life? Forget it. If there were any measure of social acceptance for breastfeeding mothers, the advertising would not be nearly so successful.
03:04 PM on 12/08/2012
I agree with Chelsea. There is a lot of stigma. I ignored it when my children were babies. But I have heard people say it's nasty or some other expression of disgust. People who don't have children are also buying into the advertisements that formula is a great alternative full of DHA and close to breastmilk--so they think, "These mums have this perfectly good alternative, and they're flaunting breastfeeding." They think it's gratuitous. There are even parents who think that. I think that mums who breastfeed should simply not let themselves be shamed. Personally, I just breastfed wherever when my children needed to. I carried shawl, but I didn't change my activities in order to shield myself from the public.
03:05 PM on 12/07/2012
mostly down to selfish mothers that have to go back to work, (or too lazy to breastfeed)
If planned properly parents should have all the financing in place before starting a family. This would then be less of a burden on the state, employers would be better off, less benefits would have to be paid out and most importantly the child would have the care from the mother and natures benefit of the milk from her breast.
04:17 PM on 12/07/2012
You knowledge in social and economic trends is abysmal. I think you need a reality check. The problem is inherent not in women per se, but in society's negative perceptions of breast feeding within the public sphere. Your view of hiding women (and their breastfeeding) within the 'private sphere' is about as backward thinking as it can get.
11:56 PM on 12/07/2012
my point had nothing to do with hiding women (and their breastfeeding) I have no objections to them doing it anywhere in public they want.My point was that women who try to balance a work & baby balance often take a selfish approach when trying to juggle both and often take the bottle as an easy option as she wont be able to breastfeed whilst at work. No hidden agenda and its not my tone of voice. Just read what the words i wrote
02:36 PM on 12/07/2012
I am a mum of 2 - from the start the support wasn't there. I went to breastfeeding classes, I hiked everywhere with a screaming hungry baby. It turned out - 4 months later of pumping and supplementing - that she was tongue tied despite being tested. By this time I was pumping but not enough was coming out so I was forced to supplement. My 2nd came along and it turned out I couldn't produce enough milk. I talked to anyone who would listen and again the support was't out there. I pumped - that was the only way I knew I couldn't produce enough.
Now whilst I agree totally that milk companies are profiteering etc. I can't tell you the amount of mums that have had similar experiences to me. The guilt and shame that we feel because we can't breastfeed is tremendous.
I tried breastfeeding whilst out and it's a nightmare. I was actually told by someone how disgusting it is - I had a cover over me too! When the support is out there, when people's perception of breastfeeding in public is changed then perhaps then we can blame the manufacturers front on. They literally saved my babies lives!
08:43 AM on 12/11/2012
I breastfed for 2 years. I only had to pump on occasion. It is horrible and doesn't produce as much milk. I'm sorry the support wasn't there for you. It should be. It isn't there because there is no profit in breast milk.

I have worked in a restaurant that sells popular pizzas. A lady was in a small sheltered area feeding her baby. The manager was disgusted. Needless to say, I told him what I thought of him!!!

Having to feed your baby in toilets is revolting. I have breastfed in public and couldn't care less what other people think of me. My babies life was more important than what a complete stranger thinks of me.

Don't feel guilty, you tried your best.
01:27 PM on 12/07/2012
One thing that needs to be done, is to provide places to breastfeed. While breastfeeding is frowned on socially, it will be difficult for the most dedicated to continue past 6 weeks.
01:06 PM on 12/10/2012
the only place I was stopped from breastfeeding was the baby clinic
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:37 AM on 12/07/2012
If We Know Breast Is Best, Why Are We Allowing the Baby Food Industry to Get Away With 'Murder'?
---------------------------------------------------
Market-centered capitalism empowers providers not users.
Users, as citizens or consumers rely on government to be interventionists when necessary.

Failure to intervened concerning diet, processed food, sugar consumption and additives reflects the power of the private sector. Not helped by the media and right-wingers screeching ''nanny sate'' any time interventionist health measures are suggested.

We cannot expect our governments to have global interventionists policies when they have none domestically.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:35 PM on 12/08/2012
Interventionist policies are anti-choice and anti-freedom.
Just because YOU want interventionist policies based on science and reason does not mean that once we accept interventionist policies we won't get others in power who wish to intervene based on faith, or tradition, or any other such thing.
Social authoritarians on both sides of the spectrum have much in common.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:07 PM on 12/08/2012
Freedom is fat!
photo
Reith
what's a micro-bio?
11:28 AM on 12/07/2012
Nestle have a lot to answer for in poorer countries.

Simple fact to me is that it's a "systems" issue. Mother milk has been inherently designed to feed a child, is as good as "tailored" to that child. It probably inducts an amount of immunity in the baby as well.

Feeding a baby cows milk is about as dubious as feeding a calf woman's milk.

Having said that there may be situations in which a mother is unable to feed a child, in which case soy milk or whatever is at hand would have to be all right.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:37 PM on 12/08/2012
I am pretty sure soy milk cannot be substituted for real milk for an infant....
Here is a link to a pro-health site who mentions that these substitutes cannot work for an infant
http://wholesomebabyfood.momtastic.com/tipmilk.htm
Breast milk is best, followed by formula, followed by cow or goat milk (which was used for generations before formula when a woman couldn't breastfeed and there were no other lactating women around)
11:18 AM on 12/07/2012
I am one of those kids who wasn't breast fed, not because of this, the actual reason was that my mom almost dies from a post-partum infection but its actually good to know this. Certainly, a bigger effort should be made.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ms Chopsy
Don't let reality ruin your day!
11:07 AM on 12/07/2012
I've boycotted Nestle since the mid-80's. I see they are still ducking and diving and trying to get around the rules.

Henri Nestle developed his baby milk formula to help save the lives of premature babies. He is probably spinning in his grave at the thought of what is being done in his name these days!
10:47 AM on 12/07/2012
The multinationals responsible should be publicly named and shamed. The Royal College of Midwives did at one point boycott nescafe because of the baby milk trade nesle were plying in the developing world. If we were better informed about how multinationals operate, we consumers in the west could choose who we wanted to do business with and who we wanted to steer clear of.
08:50 AM on 12/07/2012
The answer to the question is simple really: just like we do not use less energy and insulate our houses, etc., prefer fossil fuels to alternatives, the industries that create enormous wealth for a few keep selling products that poison humans and the tax hungry governments help them.