On the eve of the World Breast Feeding Conference taking place in Delhi this weekend, a special international report released by the World Breastfeeding Trends initiative reveals some profoundly shocking and worrying statistics. The study of 51 countries, which makes up two thirds of the world's children, demonstrates that only 40% of children born in these countries were exclusively breast fed for the first six months as recommended by the World Health Organisation and UNICEF.
The science underpinning the importance of breast feeding has been well documented and cannot be overstated. In 2003 the Lancet published a series on child survival emphasising that exclusive breast feeding, if universalised, could save 13% of all under five deaths, (an estimated 1.3million in the 42 high mortality countries). Breast milk is a unique nutritional source that not only helps protect infants from infection, but is also extremely important for child brain development and the prevention of child obesity, hypertension and cardiac diseases in later life.
There are also tremendous health benefits for breast feeding mothers, who are less likely to develop osteoporosis, are able to lose weight gained during pregnancy more easily and are at a reduced risk of developing breast, uterine and ovarian cancer. But this is not just an issue confined to developing countries. The United Kingdom has one of the lowest rates of breast feeding in Europe with the latest statistics for England stating that while 73% of new mothers initiate breastfeeding the number rapidly declines to 45% by 6-8 weeks. Professor Mitch Blair, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health's Officer for Health Promotion says that "breastfeeding is the healthiest way to feed your baby for the first six months and is known to build a strong physical and emotional bond between mother and child. Research has shown that breastfed babies are less likely to get diarrhoea or vomit, have fewer chest and ear infections, and are less likely of becoming obese. If all UK infants were exclusively breastfed for six months, admissions to hospital due to diarrhoea would be halved and those due to respiratory infections would fall by a quarter."
It's important to recognise and be sensitive to the fact that for various reasons not all women will be able to breastfeed their babies exclusively for six months, but this should apply to a small minority, not the overwhelming majority. So what is the most important cause of this noncompliance which is resulting in hundreds of thousands of premature infant deaths and unspeakable suffering throughout the world? I believe it is the over promotion and aggressive unregulated marketing of baby food products to vulnerable young mothers that not only increases the acceptability of infant formula but is contributing to this significant disease burden including rocketing rates of child obesity.
Patti Rundall, director of Baby Milk Action UK, is particularly scathing of the industry. "The most irresponsible baby companies see malnutrition as a profitable business and the perfect cover for their ' top strategic priority' which is as it always has been - to change traditional food patterns and cultures, extend bottle-feeding for years on end and encourage everyone to snack on 'slightly better for you' junk foods all day long."
Profit is clearly a very powerful motivator even at the expense of children's health. The global baby foods and infant formula market is projected to reach a staggering 30billion US dollars by 2018, but as the report highlights there are also major gaps in policies to protect breastfeeding including weak implementation for the marketing of breast milk substitutes. Earlier this year one of India's leading paediatricians Dr Arun Gupta filed charges against Nestle for allegedly violating laws against the correct labelling of infant formula products and for associated failings regarding advertisements in women's magazines.
The report emphasises that although legislation surrounding breastfeeding practices in many of these countries exists, governments are either under resourced or toothless to implement them. Powerful financial institutions continue to profit at the expense of our health. There is often a conflict between politics, corporations and ethics. But without effective intervention it is the poor, our children and the most vulnerable members of society that will suffer the most and health inequalities will continue to widen. Let us hope the inspiring voices of health campaigners in Delhi this weekend serves as a rallying call to influence policymakers to make doubly sure that exclusive breastfeeding for six months is a human right for both women and infants.
Follow Dr Aseem Malhotra on Twitter: www.twitter.com/draseemmalhotra
Dr Miriam Stoppard: Meeting my Sponsored Child in Colombia: An Unforgettable Experience
Clare Murphy: Science, Money and Women's Reproductive Choices
Key global initiatives on IFE - Definition of a breastmilk substitute
Breast milk replacement - Amazing Discoveries
Breastmilk substitute (BMS) - Emergency Nutrition Network
Infant formula - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
New Clinical Research Shows Need For Baby Formula Education
China will continue to drive global infant formula sales – Euromonitor
This is taken from article on lactivist, infant-formula-baby-milk-ingredients-additives-and-contamination-info. The whole report is pretty damning when it comes to analysing the evidence.
It will still take many years to overturn the sales patter and social conditioning which has led to massive overuse of formula milk. Advertising standards have now changed. At one time clinics and midwives were paid to promote bottle-feeding.
If you read the article and the additives that are in it, it is quite shocking.
I breast fed for just over 2 years and am thankful to say my son NEVER had formula. He only vomited once in his first 2 years and was never ill.
I agree about the 'stigmatization' of breastfeeding in Western society. It is THE most natural act and we have much to do to make it 'socially acceptable' again. BUT we're up against the large multi-national corporations that have sold this stuff at the cost of human life.
Come on ladies, do everything possible to give your little ones the best start in life, don't be sold a LIE!
I would love to see all this money spent on a more useful research project - like how men can become pregnant, give birth and breast feed. I think then you'll find that abortion becomes a sacrament and formula is handed out free to one and all.
But do you know what would save more lives that making all women breastfeed ("universalize" it, as you mentioned)? If everyone at an appropriate diet, exercised the proper amount, educated themselves consistently, knew and acted based on the knowledge of right and wrong, didn't do drugs, didn't have an protected sex, and were generally perfect.
But we aren't.
You can promote breastfeeding all you want, but you can't enforce it. People will choose what they wish to choose and demonizing them for their choice because they aren't perfect and don't necessarily make all the optimal decision just seems like a "throwing stones from a glass house" type thing
If planned properly parents should have all the financing in place before starting a family. This would then be less of a burden on the state, employers would be better off, less benefits would have to be paid out and most importantly the child would have the care from the mother and natures benefit of the milk from her breast.
Now whilst I agree totally that milk companies are profiteering etc. I can't tell you the amount of mums that have had similar experiences to me. The guilt and shame that we feel because we can't breastfeed is tremendous.
I tried breastfeeding whilst out and it's a nightmare. I was actually told by someone how disgusting it is - I had a cover over me too! When the support is out there, when people's perception of breastfeeding in public is changed then perhaps then we can blame the manufacturers front on. They literally saved my babies lives!
I have worked in a restaurant that sells popular pizzas. A lady was in a small sheltered area feeding her baby. The manager was disgusted. Needless to say, I told him what I thought of him!!!
Having to feed your baby in toilets is revolting. I have breastfed in public and couldn't care less what other people think of me. My babies life was more important than what a complete stranger thinks of me.
Don't feel guilty, you tried your best.
---------------------------------------------------
Market-centered capitalism empowers providers not users.
Users, as citizens or consumers rely on government to be interventionists when necessary.
Failure to intervened concerning diet, processed food, sugar consumption and additives reflects the power of the private sector. Not helped by the media and right-wingers screeching ''nanny sate'' any time interventionist health measures are suggested.
We cannot expect our governments to have global interventionists policies when they have none domestically.
Just because YOU want interventionist policies based on science and reason does not mean that once we accept interventionist policies we won't get others in power who wish to intervene based on faith, or tradition, or any other such thing.
Social authoritarians on both sides of the spectrum have much in common.
Simple fact to me is that it's a "systems" issue. Mother milk has been inherently designed to feed a child, is as good as "tailored" to that child. It probably inducts an amount of immunity in the baby as well.
Feeding a baby cows milk is about as dubious as feeding a calf woman's milk.
Having said that there may be situations in which a mother is unable to feed a child, in which case soy milk or whatever is at hand would have to be all right.
Here is a link to a pro-health site who mentions that these substitutes cannot work for an infant
http://wholesomebabyfood.momtastic.com/tipmilk.htm
Breast milk is best, followed by formula, followed by cow or goat milk (which was used for generations before formula when a woman couldn't breastfeed and there were no other lactating women around)
Henri Nestle developed his baby milk formula to help save the lives of premature babies. He is probably spinning in his grave at the thought of what is being done in his name these days!