Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Edmond Terakopian

GET UPDATES FROM Edmond Terakopian
 

Police Censorship: Should the Police Censor What Press Photographers Photograph on Public Streets?

Posted: 11/01/2012 23:00

It's a very worrying question, with an extremely worrying answer coming from some members of the police force and even more so from Police Community Support Officers. Having several friends in the police, I know for a fact that nowhere in their training does it state that officers should censor this country's free press.

A Police Community Support Officer (PCSO) puts her hand up to cover the lens of Nicholas Razzell, stopping him from taking pictures. The Old Bailey. 4 January 2011.

As long as members of the press aren't breaking police cordons, or on private property after being asked to leave, the police (and I include PCSOs in this) have no power, nor rights to interfere with a photographer going about doing their job of gathering news. In fact, our country goes to war to help people being oppressed by various regimes, yet we find on occasion that we are being oppressed much closer to home, not by fundamentalists or dictators, but by our own police services up and down the county.

Sadly the court case at the Old Bailey, where two of the racist murderers of Stephen Lawrence were finally jailed, illustrated just how ill-informed some members of the police and PCSOs are. Just what is the motivation to stop a story like this being covered? Did these officers in question want to protect the racist murderers from the photographers' cameras or not allow the same cameras to record the dignified Lawrence family after the verdict? This behaviour is absolutely baffling.

City of London police officers obstructing members of the press at the Old Bailey after the sentencing of David Norris and Gary Dobson for the murder of Stephen Lawrence. The Old Bailey. 4 January 2011.

Journalist, turned press photographer, Nicholas Razzell has been photographing high-profile criminal and civil court cases since 1999, including Jeffrey Archer, Paul Burrell, Kieran Fallon, Naomi Campbell, Paul McCartney, Charles Bronson, numerous murder and terrorism trials and more recently cases such as Julian Assange.

When asked about photographing these court cases, Nicholas says, "For most of the time the press and TV either self-police or on the odd occasion have had to work behind barriers. However, it is only in the last five years or so that I've found policemen and particularly PCSO's who have either no understanding of the law or it's enforcement, getting involved.

City of London police officers and PCSOs obstructing members of the press at the Old Bailey after the sentencing of David Norris and Gary Dobson for the murder of Stephen Lawrence. The Old Bailey. 4 January 2011.

"This came to head when Julian Assange was released from custody at the High Court in London when a Met Police Inspector (ably assisted by a Sky TV Producer) organised a 'pool', practically destroying any freelancers chance of getting a competitive picture."

"Last week (Stephen Lawrence case, the Old Bailey) was just another occasion where we were prevented from doing our job. As yet there is no right to privacy in the UK (thank god) and it certainly isn't up to uniformed and uninformed officers on the street, or PCSO's to decide what we can and cannot photograph. Physically preventing us from getting a picture is one step away from moral and political censorship".

City of London police officers obstructing members of the press at the Old Bailey after the sentencing of David Norris and Gary Dobson for the murder of Stephen Lawrence. The Old Bailey. 4 January 2011.

Another photographer adds, " It was a complete joke. The police officers couldn't decide which side of the street to make us stand on. One officer said we couldn't stand under the scaffolding (open to the public) on kerb opposite because "the building company haven't given you permission" - to stand on a public street? Then they insisted we stand about 50 yards away (to do a car shot) and when the car arrived one officer followed me across the street to make sure he blocked my view. I asked another officer if this was still a public street? She refused to answer".

One thing is for sure; a member of the police force should not put up their hand to cover a photographer's lens and stop images being taken. These moments happen in a fraction of a second and are gone. Press photographers have a duty to bear witness, not only for the next day's newspapers and websites, but for historical reasons too.

For any members of the police force and PCSOs unclear about the rights of citizens (including members of the media, because we are after all, citizens too) who wish to photograph in public places, may I encourage you to read the official Met Police photography advice page? Whilst the Police in question on this particular incident were City of London Police, guidelines for all Police Forces across the country are pretty much the same.

The ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) guidance on dealing with the media states: "Members of the media have a duty to take photographs and film incidents and we have no legal power or moral responsibility to prevent or restrict what they record."

"It is a matter for their editors to control what is published or broadcast, not the police."

"Once images are recorded, we have no power to delete or confiscate them without a court order, even if we think they contain damaging or useful evidence."

It also states: "Members of the media do not need a permit to photograph or film in public places."

Any member of the media across the UK, regardless of if they are a member of the NUJ or not, can report any incidents with the police to the NUJ. Please make sure you have badge numbers and if possible, audio and/or video recordings. This will not only help the press to do our jobs properly, but will also help the police train their officers and PCSOs better.

Update: A City of London Police spokesperson said: We work closely with journalists and photographers at the Old Bailey to make sure they're able to do their job and the public are able to go about their business. We continue to liaise with journalists, photographers and the local community to ensure this is the case.

This blog originally appeared on Edmond's website Photo This And That

 

Follow Edmond Terakopian on Twitter: www.twitter.com/terakopian

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:45 PM on 01/19/2012
all of these photos are dated over 12 months ago, so why talk about this 1 year on?
07:31 AM on 01/17/2012
I wonder did anyone tried to take the Met to court for loss of earnings?
after all, as a photog, you can take a lot of images as evidence. everytime the image is blocked by a hand....focus on the ID !! .... that would be a funny test case !
04:16 PM on 01/16/2012
If the COL or MET want to improve matters they can start with disaiplining officers who damage their uniforms, do so making it easy to hid their identities or like the officer in photo 2 who's wearing a 'slashed peak', not a severe as some ex-army now police officers make their caps, but illegal none the less.

Once they understand they are NOT the law, nor above the law, even for such low level things as deliberately damaging their issued uniforms, which is tax payers property, then perhaps they might respect others and other law's as well...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christos Palmer
Χριστός Παλμερ
02:06 AM on 01/15/2012
Amateur photographer myself, the police need to concentrate on catching criminals, not act as bullies bullying people around.
01:29 AM on 01/13/2012
At a time when the authority of the police is being eroded (usually by their own actions) with the public I think coppers take any questioning of their "orders" as something of a personal affront and simply push back at any perceived challenge, after which the conversation heads steadily downhill. Which rather suggests either that the force lacks the leadership to impose firm rules from above, or that ACPO is duplicitous in telling the press and public one thing and its officers another.

Either way the situation will only worsen until much more concerted, unrelenting and publicly visible action is taken by the various bodies representing press photographers and journalists. Either we fight back or the idea of a "free press" will be at the say so of every copper with an axe to grind.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
07:54 PM on 01/12/2012
another way for the police to take control of our everyday lives....carrys on like this all mobile phones will be barred.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:43 PM on 01/12/2012
Let's also not forget that amateur photographers are regularly subjected to police harassment by the use of Section 43 of the Terrorism Act.

All it takes is for an office security guard or PCSO to think you're 'acting suspiciously' (their term) and you'll find yourself being stopped-and-searched by the boys in blue.

The widely-read weekly magazine 'Amateur Photographer' reports these incidents on a regular basis.
09:26 AM on 01/12/2012
We in the BPPA have been trying for yrs(since 1984). To get to speak to police officers whilst they are still in training to explain what it is we as press photographers do. Sadly although we have been promised time and time again that we would be able to this.Every time a visit is set up its cancelled just before its due to take place. on one occasion when we actually standing outside the police training center at Hendon waiting to go in. Police officers have no training whatsoever in how to deal with the media. Until they become inspectors when they go on a course that teaches them how to behave when being interviewed on TV ! I could to go on but ill only end up getting annoyed.
Jeff Moore (Chairman British Press Photographers Association)
07:22 AM on 01/12/2012
Just as photographers should be free to point their lenses where they like in a public place, police officers should be free to put their hands where they like, as long as they are not making physical contact with anyone. The right to take photographs does not include the right to make people move out of your way. I agree that the police should not be preventing photographers from standing where they wish on a public street.
12:09 PM on 01/12/2012
Don't be so naive, DrPlotka. Yes, police officers should be (and presumably are) free to wave their arms about however they like, but these servants of the people should not be deliberately obstructing legal photography. As ACPO themselves state, "[police] have no legal power or moral responsibility to prevent or restrict what [citizens] record". So if an officer moves their arm to stretch, srcatch their nose, whatever, and it happens to block a photographer's shot, then tough luck, but if they are doing it deliberately then that is misconduct (albeit not neccessarily sanctionable misconduct).
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:45 AM on 01/12/2012
Only police states stop public photography.

Even here in the USA, where our constitution gives us "fair and public trials", we have cops arresting and seizing cameras.