I am passionate about influencing people to live healthier lives and I want to share my experiences to do my bit to build happier and healthier communities. As such, like many others in the 'fitness industry', I am vocal about the benefits of exercise and good nutrition.
But for all of our good intentions, are we passing on the right messages and does our constant promotion of all things food and fitness help or hinder?
Overall I think that we, the fitness community, do some hugely positive things, inspiring people to make changes, which can sometimes be genuinely life changing. However, I am also aware that in our haste and enthusiasm to promote our fitness ideals, we are also in part to blame for the veil of confusion that has descended upon it all, which brings with it more questions than answers.
There are a few mainstream messages that we need to gain some context and clarity around, two very common examples being the notion that to lose weight we should simply increase our activity level whilst simultaneously reducing calories, and that the best way to go about getting into shape is to couple a low carb diet with a regime of high intensity interval training. Both of which will work at some stage, but neither of which represents a successful long-term strategy for most of us.
And the truth is that very few us are ideal candidates for short-term, quick fix, get-me-thin-come-what-may, beach body programmes.
Increased exercise and reduced calorie intake is the most popularized of the two, largely because, in the end, losing or gaining weight comes down to the basic law of thermodynamics. If we consume fewer calories than we expend (a calorie deficit), and we lose weight, but consume more than we expend (a calorie surplus), and we gain weight. This being the case, it makes perfect sense that we create a calorie deficit by eating fewer calories and moving more. The problem is that it is not quite that simple in the long run.
It seems counterintuitive to me that whilst we increase our nutritional requirements, we simultaneously reduce our dietary intake. On one hand we're asking more of the body, but on the other we're purposely providing it with less. This approach is very likely to fail long term, as the body will not get what it needs and can only function like this for a short period.
I agree that we need to create an overall calorie deficit if we want to lose weight, but I would argue that doing it in such an extreme fashion, that is doing both at once, is not a sustainable long-term approach.
The rule of thumb is that the more extreme the exercise and nutritional approach, the greater the likelihood that we will gravitate back to where we started in a matter of a weeks.
Most of us will do far better if we do things in stages. Sure, you'll see rapid weight loss if you cut calories and increase activity, but you are likely to lose more than fat, much needed muscle mass for example, and you'll soon hit a plateau once your body gets used to your new routine - you adapt. At this point, you'll need to do something new in order for the body to change, which is where many of us become unstuck.
The reality for most of us is that we don't have much wiggle room, given that we've probably near maximized our calorie reduction and increased movement options. Some of us will go to extremes and continue with further exercise and or dietary modification, whilst others of us will throw in the towel, because despite exercising three or four times per week and restricting all of the food and drink that we are prepared to, we are still not making progress - something I can certainly relate to.
I appreciate that might sound rather clichéd, but changing our outlook towards fitness and adopting more of a lifestyle approach to getting fit might be one of the most important things that we can do for our health.
The answer is to do things more slowly, giving the body a chance to adapt to, and benefit from, smaller and more gradual changes. It is important to recognize that we need to give the body what it needs to perform and recover, rather than simply cut calories, because long-term we cannot continue to live in a way that demands more of us physically but restricts our sources of energy and vital nutrients - it depletes us both mentally and physically and is not sustainable.
There is no magic programme, no best diet, and no new workout system that can guarantee results in six weeks. The 'golden goose' that we are all looking for is a programme that we can do consistently, not one that we can only stick to for six weeks.
I understand that this does not sound particularly appealing, and it is not as marketable as the latest training system, but it is the only thing that works long term.
When it comes to fat loss and improved health, smaller and more regular changes over time much are very often much more effective than the typical all or nothing approach. Most of us respond less well to extreme approaches and it is a far easier and more enjoyable process, and the results are likely to stick, if we do things more gradually, tweaking as we go.Suggest a correction