Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Laura Dunn

GET UPDATES FROM Laura Dunn
 

The Importance of Inclusion and Equality in Female Leadership

Posted: 18/04/2012 00:00

I recently attended a Pierhead Sessions lecture at the National Assembly for Wales, where former Prime Minister of New Zealand, and current Administrator for the United Nations Development Programme, Helen Clark spoke on the topic of inclusion and equality in female leadership. Clark specifically focused upon these two entities for the development of women leaders, her speech highlighting that women in the UK, and across the world still have progress to make in order to gain equality.

The statistics speak for themselves: the global average of women holding parliamentary seats remains under 20%, a below average figure of the 30% target set in the 1995 Beijing Platform for Action. At this current rate, the target will not be reached on globally before 2025, and indeed long beyond that in many other countries. 16% of ministers are women, with academic research demonstrating that women in politics are traditionally given 'soft' positions, dealing with policy areas including social welfare, families, and women.

If we look at the UK government, only four women are cabinet ministers- Teresa May as Home Secretary, Justine Greening as Minister for Transport, Caroline Spelman at Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Cheryl Gillan as Secretary of State for Wales. Personally, I don't regard these four portfolios as soft topics, and indeed these four women are currently in control of some of the most challenging areas of legislation and policy development. I find it startling that in the second decade of the 21st century only 5% of Heads of State are women, examples including Queen Elizabeth II and President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia. We must do better to raise this statistic before the decade is out.

It is perhaps the National Assembly for Wales who has paved the way towards equality for women in UK political life. In the short history of the Welsh Assembly, female AMs have held at least half of the Cabinet positions. The Third Assembly saw four women in Ministerial roles, with another three made Deputy Ministers. The current Fourth Assembly sees female AMs continuing to have a great impact in the Welsh government, with three women, Edwina Hart, Lesley Griffiths and Jane Hutt holding the respective portfolios of Business, Health, and Finance. Women continue to be influential at many other levels in the National Assembly including a Deputy Minister, a Chief Whip, two party Commissioners and one as the leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats. The National Assembly also saw its selection of Rosemary Butler as the first female Presiding Officer in 2011.

Helen Clark was keen to stress that the critical mass of women is an important factor, particularly for ensuring that democracy is fairly represented. Gender equality is a basic right in the United Nations charter, and under Clark's tenure, the establishment of UN Women has created a clear vision of equality and empowerment for women across the globe. The focus areas included combating violence against women, building towards peace and security, encouraging leadership and participation, creating economic empowerment and achieving the Millennium Development Goals. All of these are serious issues that need to be addressed, and with positive examples of success I believe that these are areas which can be achieved in some of the world's most impoverished nations.

Perhaps one of the most interesting discussions of the evening was focused towards the use of quotas for selecting female politicians. This technique has been used in Wales, and was particularly successful in electing women to the National Assembly in 2007. Since devolution, the proportion of Assembly Members who are women has never dropped below forty percent, and the 2007 election saw a high of 51%, achieving new levels of gender parity. Parties including Welsh Labour and Plaid Cymru did not use this technique in last year's Assembly elections, and a total of 24 women were elected to serve in the Fourth Assembly. Whilst this is a great achievement, one does wonder that if quotas had been used would more women be sitting in Cardiff Bay?

This year, the United Nations released a 'best practice' guide to help promote female political participation. 'Empowering Women for Political Parties' identifies targeted interventions for promoting the stronger presence and influence of women in political parties, as well as advancing gender equality issues in political parties and platforms. Some of these measures including expanding and training the pool of women candidates, establishing women's sections of parties and setting targets for female participation will, I believe, help to positively increase the levels of women involved in politics.

Clark was keen to stress that women who feel passionate about making a difference should be politically active. So ladies, whatever your political direction, get out there, be active and change the world!

 

Follow Laura Dunn on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@lauraemilyd

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
I recently attended a Pierhead Sessions lecture at the National Assembly for Wales, where former Prime Minister of New Zealand, and current Administrator for the United Nations Development Programme, ...
I recently attended a Pierhead Sessions lecture at the National Assembly for Wales, where former Prime Minister of New Zealand, and current Administrator for the United Nations Development Programme, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:36 PM on 04/18/2012
To the comments below, your argument would be more persuasive if you could name a single woman in the tiny percentages quoted, who has got there by positive discrimination or, more relevantly, lack of ability. If that were genuinely the case, there would be equal statistics already. So, perhaps the writer and the speakers at the conference do have a point. Whatever we are currently doing, it's not achieving equality. Even if current practices and policies do include positive discrimination - which, by the way, is not about promoting someone less skilled over someone more skilled, it is about promoting a woman where there are candidates of equal merit - it's not a winning strategy!

In reality there appears to be no such thing as positive discrimination in practice - which is not about depriving men of powerful positions. It's actually about ensuring the most talented can occupy those positions regardless of gender and regardless of social assumptions. If you think the conditions for equality already exist, please state where so that the rest of the world can find and implement them!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shreen Ayob
01:59 PM on 04/18/2012
But do you think that equality of opportunity would naturally result in equality of results?
08:34 PM on 04/18/2012
I think that equal opportunity would have at its foundation a level playing field for equal results to have any hope. The starting point must be changing attitudes and removing prejudice. For example, just because I think women should be more present in positions of power - partly because the law of probability would have it that way - doesn't mean I think men are second rate citizens or inferior. Yet many make that assumption just because I hold that initial view.

If conditions of equality already exist can it seriously be only because men are superior or because women are simply not interested? Surely, regardless of gender or race, 'power' holds the same attractiveness for the majority of human beings. Wouldn't most people find it even a little gratifying to feel they had the genuine opportunity to contribute to a bigger cause, to change the world?

I believe attitudes are the reason we don't have a level playing field. Once discriminatory views no longer dominate then perhaps we can focus on the issue of re-building the family unit such that it does not depend on two incomes or one high income - leaving couples with little choice about who, male OR female, takes on the role of primary carer and puts their career on hold. Only then might we have a chance of seeing whether the numbers play out as I expect or as you expect!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shreen Ayob
01:04 PM on 04/18/2012
Having a nightmare trying to log in so forgive me if this is posted twice but...

Do you believe that equality has only been achieved when everything is 50/50 male/female or thereabouts? That's not the case. Equality of opportunity doesn't equate to equality of results.

If some sort of barrier to entry exists then let's work on that sure, but don't expect women to suddenly grab the opportunity available to them. If the opportunity is there, if women can freely make the choice to go into politics, they may not necessarily take it. And this does not imply a sexist conspiracy.

I think quotas are an awful tactic and I explain why here (also on the Huffington Post UK):

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/shreen-ayob/feminism-will-eat-itself-_b_1400254.html
04:15 PM on 04/22/2012
Women can't freely make the choice to enter politics, that is the point. Why are you not focusing on reality rather than talking about a hypothetical situation that does not currently exist. There are barriers to entry, let's get rid of them, then see what the percentages look like.

Women need critical mass in order to demand those changes, that's why quotas are necessary. You ignore the entirety of history to argue that those barriers will come down without the people in power choosing to make it happen. Women need power to gain equality, that only comes from strength in numbers. It may not be pretty, but nothing, NOTHING else has ever worked.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shreen Ayob
10:01 PM on 04/22/2012
I agree with the motivation, but not the method. I've experienced an office that used [something close to] quotas first hand, and the atmosphere it bred was not pretty.
09:31 AM on 04/18/2012
The fact that there are less women in Government, and the upper echelons of business, is most definitely not because there are barriers to entry. Because of the wonderful world of political correctness we now have positive discrimination towards women at every level, I witness it every day. Both government and business are, in the main, meritocracies. This means that it is more likely that women are either not interested or not capable rather than hindered by a patriarchal society.

I am in no way saying that I believe women to be inferior, nor am I implying that all things in government and business are equal, but there comes a point where you have to ask the questions; do the majority of women actually care about being in a position of power? Is it the minority of women with inferiority complexes causing all of this gender equality debate?
04:16 PM on 04/22/2012
"Both government and business are, in the main, meritocracies"

Hahaha. Are you telling us that David Cameron is the best there is? Hahaha.