Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Nicky Gavron

GET UPDATES FROM Nicky Gavron
 

Homes for London?

Posted: 28/05/2012 00:00

How's this for a brazen piece of rebranding?

On 20 April, with his re-election looming, Boris Johnson pledged to deliver on Shelter's campaign to create 'Homes for London'. Post-election, it has become crystal clear that Boris had no idea what measures he had signed up to.

During Wednesday's Mayor's Question Time he told me that the Homes for London he has created is simply the new name for The London Housing Board. He's taken the name but none of the initiatives or policies.

He even told me he would have to "look at the detail of what is entailed by that pledge".

This makes it hard to consider his pre-election support as anything other than cynical electioneering. Boris Johnson got good publicity off the back of his pledge and at the time of writing the Homes for London website still proudly proclaims:

"At the end of April we had a major win: Boris Johnson pledged to create Homes for London."

Not that he noticed. On Wednesday he told me:

"I may have had a lot of publicity but not enough to come to my attention."

But the biggest shame is not that Boris Johnson seems to have notched up the first broken promise of his second term, but that he is going to continue to fail millions of Londoners living in the private rented sector.

Rents rose 12% last year alone, complaints about rogue landlords and rip-off letting agents are increasing and the government's welfare reforms will compound the pain.

Shelter's Homes for London provided some solution to these. A mayoral London-wide Letting Agency with fairer rents and securer longer-term tenancies that work for families coupled with a drive to prosecute rogue landlords - these are not just good ideas, they are an essential minimum.

Boris Johnson should pay attention. To date, his record on the private rented sector is worse than poor.

His main 'achievements' being a voluntary landlord accreditation scheme with no qualifying criteria, a London Rents Map that tells Londoners where they cannot afford to live and a Housing Strategy with no policies to tackle rogue landlords and extortionate rent increases. His manifesto was equally threadbare, promising just more of the same.

A third of London households now live in this sector. Their living standards are being squeezed, people can't get deposits together, poor environmental standards effect their health and children's wellbeing and education is damaged by the constant churn.

The Mayor has the position, influence and power to tackle these problems. So far he has chosen not to. Let's hope, once he studies the details, he will change his mind.

Nicky Gavron AM is the London Assembly Labour Spokesperson for Housing and Planning
You can follow Nicky on twitter at twitter.com/nickygavron and at nickygavron.co.uk

 
FOLLOW UK POLITICS
How's this for a brazen piece of rebranding? On 20 April, with his re-election looming, Boris Johnson pledged to deliver on Shelter's campaign to create 'Homes for London'. Post-election, it has beco...
How's this for a brazen piece of rebranding? On 20 April, with his re-election looming, Boris Johnson pledged to deliver on Shelter's campaign to create 'Homes for London'. Post-election, it has beco...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:14 on 30/05/2012
I agree it's terrible that Londoners are made to pay so much for so little. But there is a question about why people choose to live in London. It's overcrowded, polluted, congested, expensive and chaotic. Surely the government should be incentivising people to move away from London to take the heat out of the housing sector there.
01:50 on 29/05/2012
The problem is compounded by the fact that Councils' over the years have been selling them off for a one time financial fix and the fact many migrants are in need of social housing from day 1 of arrival in Britain plus many are sub let ilegally and many occupied by persons whose incomes would otherwise now prelude them Council rentals. Political promises will the best one can expect.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunderan
Who let the Libertarians out without supervision?
22:49 on 28/05/2012
The people of London knew in his first term what Boris was going to be like and yet they choose him twice over Ken Livingston.That to me says its not about the media or messaging Ken was a rubbish candidate with a track record of failure and labour if they have anything to offer will have to prove it by getting better policies and less grandstanding politicians at all levels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drg40
Representative Democracy is all we have.
07:37 on 29/05/2012
Except that there were other candidates, but the media ignored them, as far as the law allowed, and sought to persuade the voters that the choice lay between Livingstone and Johnson. Since, using your own words, Livingstone was a rubbish candidate, that means that, in effect, the media all backed Johnson, whose victory in the end was so fine clearly he too is little more than a rubbish candidate. I fear that media corruption is rather more subtle, all pervasive and effective than you give the discredit for.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunderan
Who let the Libertarians out without supervision?
09:52 on 29/05/2012
You are right, i suppose i was hoping in the age of the Internet people have the tools to both reach a much bigger audience without relying on traditional media and for that audience to be able to do their own research.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunderan
Who let the Libertarians out without supervision?
22:49 on 28/05/2012
When i lived in London,the rent included electric and poll tax and worked out cheaper than the city i moved to.In fact i could have paid the same amount for a massive onebedroom falt with all bills included for the same as i paid when i moved for a room in a shared flat and all the bills on top.
Landlords are unscrupilous everywhere as are people who lie to get cheap part-ownership properties and dont even live there pay off the part-share price and make a massive profit on the sale.
No mention of that in your article and i was in London under your Wondergod Ken Livingston so i dont think you can throw rocks at Borris.Always remember the Jubilee line and what a shambles that was again uner Ken.
Labour need to find people at all levels that stop trying to make themselves look better by dragging others down.New idea's are needed or new versions of old ideas.The authour of this article has nothing to offer just idea's from other people(which is not always a bad idea at all) but please use them positively not just to say Boris is bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Fowler
I try....I really do!
20:52 on 28/05/2012
Ah, yet another Labour member who has conveniently forgotten that in London, many councils have over 50% NON BRITISH now taking all available housing. Due in no small part to Labours appauling "open door" policy to immigration that STILL burdens the Britsh citizen and drives down many of this nations poorest and low paid into the grasping hands of Dickensian slum landlords.

"Lest we forget" should be Labours new motto.......as it seems that they think WE DO!
12:11 on 29/05/2012
You are correct. Labour's open door immigration policy, and its failure to build sufficient social housing is the prime reason why rents are so high and wages so low. A win win situation for BTL landlords and unscrupulous employers (the pro-immigrationists), but for the working poor/unemployed a living nightmare. The article didn't mention that the vast majority of private landlords DON'T ACCEPT housing benefits making the situation even more difficult for those seeking affordable accommodation. Low paid workers and the unemployed have been betrayed by Labour and are being seriously let down by this governments failures to curb net immigration.