Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Nik Darlington

GET UPDATES FROM Nik Darlington

Tory Grassroots in Manchester Show Little Appetite for Fighting Murdo Fraser's Separation

Posted: 05/10/11 12:51 BST

The Scottish Conservative & Unionist party held a leadership hustings in Manchester on Monday. In a hotly contested debate (in an even hotter Midlands Hotel), Murdo Fraser, Ruth Davidson, Margaret Mitchell and Jackson Carlaw entreated an attentive audience to support them in their bids to lead a political party at rock bottom.

In an unscientific exit poll conducted by bloggers Tory Hoose, Mitchell languishes at the bottom with single figure support. She may have come with the biggest banner but left with the biggest mountain to climb. A late entrant to the contest, this is unsurprising. If the 'traditionalists' want to stop Murdo Fraser's radical plan to change the party's name, one (or both) of Mitchell and Carlaw (who polled a healthier 26 per cent) need to withdraw so not to split the vote.

For whilst each candidate tried to stress their unique qualities, in reality Davidson, Mitchell and Carlaw did little beyond define themselves against Fraser. There were smidgens, smudges and fudges of policy but only the provocative Fraser brings decisive change to the table, however misguided it might be to many.

It was Fraser who came out of the hustings with the slenderest of leads - 1 percentage point - over Ruth Davidson, although his younger challenger is a slim bookies' favourite in a tight race.

Davidson is an attractive choice in many ways. She would become, I think, the first gay leader of a political party in the UK, and as Craig Barrett wrote last week, she has an interesting CV - "a Sunday School teacher and a former TA officer". She also managed to get elected earlier this year in Glasgow, of all places. Unlike the other candidates, therefore, she is already a proven winner at the young age of thirty-two.

Yet whilst Davidson has attracted some high profile support, such as the respected John Lamont MSP and Leader of the House of Lords, Lord Strathclyde, it is Murdo Fraser who can count on more Tory MSPs. Were Davidson to win, she could struggle to lead a parliamentary party that wanted someone else. Nevertheless, the recent Sanderson Report envisaged a national leader who would appeal beyond the narrow political base.

Around the conference, however, the Tory grassroots are strangely uninterested. Ask people who they would choose and they struggle to name all of the candidates, proving that it isn't only busy party leaders who forget names. Most have heard of Murdo Fraser's proposal to create a new centre right party and many recoil from the idea, but scarcely care enough to express any preference.

Perhaps that is more remarkable, and for the traditionalists more concerning. The Conservative members here are overwhelmingly English and overwhelmingly uninterested in the Scottish leadership. When pushed, most members disagree with Murdo Fraser, and almost all members support the Union; but the lack of appetite for the contest gives the impression that their Scottish kin are very much already on their own.

 

Follow Nik Darlington on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NikDarlington

 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:18 PM on 10/08/2011
Ruth wouldn't be the first openly-gay leader of a party in Scotland: Patrick Harvie of the Scottish Greens would hold that distinction.
01:46 PM on 10/06/2011
Here's the thing - why were the hustings not in Scotland?

We Scots know that the main banker for the Scottish wing has basically said Murdo Fraser - over my dead body. That Ruth is Dave's intended heir and is being 'groomed' by Dave's people.

The Tories only have one MP in Scotland and he is currently awaiting his day in court for alleged Election Expense discrepancies. As for Ruth she was elected from the 'List' rather than as a constituency MSP, like all Tories sitting in Holyrood.

Then you have the Yougov poll which does not look good reading for any of the Westminster based parties:

Do you think Labour are doing a good job representing the people of Scotland?

The GB panel responded: Well 32% : Badly 26%
The Scots panel answered: Well 28% : Badly 50%

Do you think the Conservatives are doing a good job of representing Scotland?

The GB panel responded: Well 10% : Badly 50%
The Scots panel responded: Well 11% : Badly 68%

It appears that the Conservatives intended Scottish muppet and Labours intended Scottish puppet will have to find a better line than simply regurgitating the Westminster 'we hate the SNP' message. The Scots are just not buying it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:28 PM on 10/09/2011
"why were the hustings not in Scotland?"

If they'd held their meeting in Scotland.... nobody would have been there... there arenae enough Tory activists in Scotland to fill a hall.

Your more serious point is, of course, true. Nobody up here is taking the London based dependence parties seriously any more. Opposition for its own sake just isn't working and they're all stuck in their wee timewarp. We need a coherent opposition, complete with ideas, principles and policy initiatives for the benefit of Scotland. The Westminster trio are letting us down... again.

Nae surprises there though.