Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Guest

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Guest
 

How Migration Makes the World Brainier

Posted: 30/11/2011 23:00

A few years ago, I visited a library in North Korea. I asked the librarian which authors were popular. He replied that everyone loved the works of the Great Leader Kim Il-Sung and his son, the Dear Leader Kim Jong-Il. Sure, I said, but what other authors did North Koreans like?

The librarian fell silent. He could not name a single one.

Of the 70-odd countries I've reported from, North Korea is perhaps the most illuminating. The world's last Stalinist dictatorship is hermetically sealed from the outside world. Hardly anyone is allowed out, and hardly anyone is allowed in (it wasn't easy getting a visa.)

Because North Korea shuts out people, it shuts out ideas. That's one big reason why it is a starving backwater. Its more open cousin, South Korea, which welcomes foreigners and sends hordes of students and businesspeople abroad each year, is 17 times richer.

South Koreans worry whether their children will make it to the right university; North Koreans worry whether their children will make it to the age of five.

The central message of my book, Borderless Economics, is that when people move around, they spread new ideas, mostly for the better.

For example, the world's cheapest fridge was born of a marriage of minds between Indians in America and Indians in India. Three Indian-American engineers (Uttam Ghoshal, Himanshu Pokharna and Ayan Guha) were working on a cooling device, based on technology used to cool laptops, that they thought might work in a fridge. One of them had trained at IBM, so he knew a thing or two about computers.

While back in India visiting relatives, they decided to show their design to an Indian manufacturer called Godrej and Boyce. It so happened that Godrej was already working on a super-cheap fridge for poor rural Indians. The two teams joined forces and produced a little fridge called the Chotu Kool that will sell for a mere $70 - less than half the price of rival fridges.

This is a common story. Brainy Indians or Chinese emigrate to the West. They imbibe technology at a western university. They work for a while at a western firm. They stay in touch with their brainy compatriots back home. They constantly swap ideas - something that was difficult a generation ago but now, thanks to cheap communications, is laughably easy.

Sometimes migrants go home, bringing the latest western know-how with them. I asked the boss of Tata Consulting Services, a big Indian IT firm, what proportion of his top people had studied or worked abroad. He replied: "All of them."

A study by the Kauffman Foundation found that two-thirds of entrepreneurs who return to India from America maintain at least monthly contact with their old colleagues in America.

For now, the West is far more advanced than the emerging nations, but they are catching up fast. Ideas already flow in both directions, and before long, the trickle of technology out of India and China will turn into a torrent.

A good example is 'frugal innovation'. Chinese and Indian firms are leading the way in making products that are not merely 10% cheaper than the alternatives, but 90% cheaper.

Asian frugal innovators are making not only fridges but also medical devices and pre-fabricated houses that are an order of magnitude cheaper than we are used to. Devi Shetty, a veteran of Guy's Hospital in London, now runs a heart hospital in Mangalore where heart bypasses cost less than $2,000 (compared with $20,000 - $100,000 in America) and survival rates are just as good.

Asians embrace frugal innovation out of necessity. Westerners will embrace it because, other things being equal, we'd rather not pay more. And we will be far better plugged in to the coming boom in Asian technology if we allow more Asians to work and study here.

Migration boosts business, too.

Consider the story of Cheung Yan, a Chinese woman who moved to America two decades ago. She noticed two things. First, Americans throw out mountains of waste paper. Second, cargo ships sail fully-laden from China to America but go back half-empty. (American exports to China, such as films and IOUs from the government, don't take up much space.)

So she loaded that waste paper onto ships and sent it to China for recycling. Using her connections there, she set up factories to turn it into cardboard (much of which was turned into boxes for televisions that were then shipped back to America).

She is now one of the richest women in the world. Her business is part-Chinese, part-American; part of what Niall Ferguson, a historian, calls 'Chimerica'. As an outsider who understood both countries, Mrs Cheung spotted an opportunity that was invisible to her monocultural neighbours. And both countries benefited from what she saw.

The world is full of budding Cheung Yans. Some 70 million Chinese live outside mainland China. They form 70 million bridges between their motherland and the rest of the world. They speak the language, they understand the business culture and they have connections. That matters immensely in a country where the rule of law is unreliable. It's why nearly 70% of foreign direct investment in China is handled by the overseas Chinese, and why western firms find it easier to do business there if they hire Chinese immigrants.

Migrants bring youth, energy and better food. In Britain and the US, they pay far more in taxes than they consume in public services, and are twice as likely as the native-born to start their own companies.

But the most important reason for welcoming newcomers is that they bring bright new ideas.

No rich country is going to allow unlimited immigration from poor ones any time soon. But if we shut all the doors and windows, it's going to be awfully dark in here.

Robert Guest is the Business Editor of The Economist and the author of Borderless Economics: Chinese Sea Turtles, Indian Fridges and the New Fruits of Global Capitalism, which will be published by Palgrave Macmillan on 1 December

 
FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:25 PM on 12/05/2011
Overlooks environmental effect of population increase. Ergo, pointless article.
12:22 PM on 12/05/2011
All this arguement is somewhat irrelevant when the country is overflowing with people and it's groaning under the burden and so are the indegenous people. It just can't continue. It can only be a bad thing because of the burden it puts on everyone else. It doesn't matter how bright they are. We just can't afford them in anyway any more.
08:37 AM on 12/05/2011
What's good for Korea is not particularly good for us in the UK. Unfortunately the ideas that our immigrants bring us are not always the type of ideas we would welco
05:32 PM on 12/04/2011
Brainy migrants come to West - this is a good thing. Brainy expats go to developing world - this is called ''neo-colonialism.'' A bad thing.

Many migrants from poor countries bring with them premodern notions entailing subordination of women. Tolerating this is rationalized as multiculturalism. Opposing it places one in danger of accusations of racism or Islamophobia.

Cultural aspects of immigration currently predominate: the economic aspects are secondary.

Looking honestly and discussing openly and freely these cultural aspects is not easy. But we have to do it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sorab Shroff
11:47 AM on 12/04/2011
Very interesting article - thank you! Makes a change from the usual hysterical tone (on both sides) of the immigration debate.
09:35 AM on 12/03/2011
"In Britain and the US, they pay far more in taxes than they consume in public services"

And that is a flat, outright lie.
09:33 AM on 12/03/2011
Poor, sloppy rationalisation. North Korea's borders are more to keep the population from fleeing than to prevent waves of Chinese immigrants. Why would anyone emigrate to North Korea, unless they were communists and wanted to experience life under an authentic communist regime?

Japan on the other hand is notoriously difficult to gain residency in, and they have one of the most innovative cultures on the planet.

So it's the political and cultural systems which dictate whether a culture is successful or not, not the level of immigration.

You can have free flow of ideas without requiring free flow of people. You might have heard of the telephone system, internet, television ...
photo
Peter Combs
Amused by the illogical..no, NOT a Republican
12:04 AM on 12/02/2011
Historically in the US and in most countries Immigration numbers are dictated by the need of the receiving nations need to increase the population. The absoprtion takes time, to assimilate, educate, overcome language barriers, find jobs, housing etc..Our current situtaion illustrates clearly why the situation we have now isn't working.

" In Britain and the US, they pay far more in taxes than they consume in public services, and are twice as likely as the native-born to start their own companies." If this argument includes illegals, the numbers you have are inaccurate..

California is a classic example...
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/immigrationnaturalizatio/a/caillegals.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beverlyg
06:50 PM on 12/01/2011
Mr. Guest, you need to study algebra. The number of unemployed is equal to new + old jobs - population increase. Legal and illegal immigration excede new jobs.
Without a large construction industry unemployment will remain high. Apparently immigrants of recent decades comprise much of the unemployment.
To reduce unemployment in the near term requires curtailing the inflow until we can restore a prosperous economy.
08:27 PM on 12/05/2011
Agree. Go back to school, Mr. Guest!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex Morrison
05:45 PM on 12/01/2011
I think the problem is that a lot of people can't get past the simple "us and them" mentality. Somehow people think it's better for someone "home-grown" to get a job over someone born elsewhere - as though where you're born makes a blind bit of difference about what sort of person you are or the abilities you have. It's hard to imagine an end to the persistent public anger about foreigners taking our jobs and scrounging off benefits (mutually exclusive by the way), but healthy competition between individuals, not nationalities, can only be a good thing for Britain or any other country.
Oddly, it seems like the same people who have condemned the recent UK strikes on the grounds that public sector workers should not be protected any more than the rest of us, want protection for themselves based on the colour of their passport.
12:18 PM on 12/05/2011
That's easy to say but very hard to accept when you have no work and your family have absolutely nothing but incomers seem to be getting everything including more rights to open their mouths.
08:31 PM on 12/05/2011
You've got the point about healthy competition wrong. For example, the living standards of the low paid improved dramatically in the aftermath of the Black Death.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
04:27 PM on 12/01/2011
So how does this play out for use here in the states? Our businesses use this Brainy Cheap labor for a few years, forcing our own Brainy Expensive labor out of work and only the business and the Foreign countries benefit.

I am all for sharing but at some point we have to protect some of our own people.

I see it like a river, if you don't put some lock and dams in place, parts of the river are unusable.
12:37 PM on 12/01/2011
It only makes your country brainier if the people you let in are brainy.
Too many European countries have made the mistake of letting in people with bigoted ideas against women and gays, people who approve of honour killings, genital mutilation, slaughter of animals and other barbarian practices.
It's time to recalibrate immigration policies, but I fear we are already too late.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
02:34 PM on 12/01/2011
The point of the article though is that it makes the World brainier as a whole, because people share ideas. Each shared idea generates many more ideas, and so on. It's a question of the whole becoming greater than the sum of its parts.
11:28 AM on 12/03/2011
That would only work if the strategies of the 'brainy' world (which in my opinion is comprised of Western Europe, North America, Japan etc) were copied by the peoples of the 'dumb' world.

In fact the exact opposite is happening in the UK at least, where cultural behaviours (such as Afro Caribbean gang culture, Pakistani inbreeding or general misogyny and homophobia found in the third world) which are plainly absurd, inferior and destructive are allowed to propagate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:34 PM on 12/01/2011
Pardon me, sir, but ... "what ... a ... load ... of ... utter ... hogwash!!"

The place where people live does not make them "branier." It might make them "cheaper" according to a few mis-guided accountants and lawyers (NONE of whom, I might add, would ever advocate replacing a company's accountants or lawyers with "cheaper people"), but it won't make the slightest difference as to either their intelligence or their effectiveness.

You can always spot the "cheaper" car. It's the one sitting by the side of the road along the Interstate. "There is always someone who can build a thing a little 'cheaper,' and those who consider price alone ... etc."

We are literally a melting-pot nation. We always have been. But to say that the grass is greener on the cheaper side of the fence is vacuous sophistry. And, by the way, insane. And, also by the way, utterly demeaning of ALL of the individuals involved, on both sides of "the pond," treating them merely as tokens of commerce and not as individuals.

There is NO such thing as a "human 'resource.' "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
Anti war Anti Spying Anti Assassination Veteran
12:16 PM on 12/01/2011
As long as you understand that migration is not the same as illegal immigration.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:35 PM on 12/01/2011
... yes ... anything that is exploitative of anyone or anything is not "smart."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
10:17 AM on 12/01/2011
"The world is full of budding Cheung Yans. Some 70 million Chinese live outside mainland China."
===

The problem is that there's not an infinite demand for budding Cheung Yans.