Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sam Maule

GET UPDATES FROM Sam Maule
 

St. Paul's Protesters Are Right, Now We Need Action

Posted: 13/11/2011 23:00

2011 may be remembered in history as the year of the revolution. First the Arab spring ravaged through the Middle East and North Africa, leaving dictators arrested, exiled or dead in its wake. Now we are facing an autumn tinged with the spirit of anti-capitalism. Who knows, applying the nomenclature of late, we may yet see a Western Winter.

The sentiment at the heart of the protests, which have now extended across the western world, is the crippling sense of injustice and a lack of power that has formed from the dangerous combination of a warped democracy and a broken economic system.

I believe that those dubbing themselves the 99% are right to protest and to understand this point of view I think it is crucially important to understand why they are protesting. I will shift my focus specifically onto the UK whilst doing this, but I think the same argument (if slightly modified) can apply across the western world.

I think it is safe to say that if our current coalition government was acting to improve social mobility, child poverty and employment prospects the St. Pauls café would currently be open. I think it is equally safe to say that if the burden of paying back our national debt was placed fairly and visibly across all income groups the gift shop would probably be open too. The prospect of our national debt being paid back by those who can scarcely afford it whilst the top income earners appear not only unaffected, but uninterested too, has grated a number of people, and it is not hard to see why.

Our government's debt-busting policies have failed the masses. VAT is a regressive tax placing a larger burden on the poor, as are cuts to services. The 50p tax rate is potentially going to be scrapped on the basis that it does not raise enough money. What does this indicate if not the fact that it has become far too easy to hide and shift income? Similarly the trends we are seeing in energy prices have put the problems of the global resource crisis in the hands of our country's poor.

Another factor contributing to the anger of the banner wielding 99% is that the quest of the top percentile to gain and entrench their position in society hurts the rest of society. The picture would probably be quite different if the top 1% were our country's doctors and teachers. To solidify this claim, a study by the New Economics Foundation has shown that leading city bankers, with incomes of £500,000 or more, destroy £7 of social value for every £1 they earn. That's £3.5m each; at least. By way of comparison hospital cleaners generate £10 of social value for every £1 they earn.

It is often said against the protesters that they have no exact demands; but should they? Do these critics really expect the next Marx and Engels to emerge from behind a sign reading "Robin Hood was right" with their treatise for a fairer world? Because that is what it is going to take. Our current system, neoliberalism, insofar as it is designed to spread the benefits of growth throughout the economy, has failed. The only thing that has spread is the myth that it will. Since this doctrine took over the Anglo-Saxon economies back in 1979, real wages for the majority of earners have barely increased while the top 1% now takes roughly 20% of total income.

The recent protests have done enough to show that something needs to be done, the question however is what. The creation of more adequately-paid jobs, acting to equalise our education system and investigating why the voice of the most disadvantaged is not being heard, would be a good starting point. The protests have already given our government the legitimacy to act; now all it needs is the will.

 

Follow Sam Maule on Twitter: www.twitter.com/SEmaule

2011 may be remembered in history as the year of the revolution. First the Arab spring ravaged through the Middle East and North Africa, leaving dictators arrested, exiled or dead in its wake. Now we ...
2011 may be remembered in history as the year of the revolution. First the Arab spring ravaged through the Middle East and North Africa, leaving dictators arrested, exiled or dead in its wake. Now we ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
23:35 on 15/11/2011
There has been a lot of nonsense about the 99% being anti-capitalism. Anti-capitalism isn't the target. The target is the fact that there are too many people in the system who manipulate the markets for no other reason than to satisfy their greed. These people add nothing to society but drain it of precious resources. Capitalism with free markets and anti-monopolies can deliver great benefits but the 1%, or at least the majority of them, have shown that they couldn't care less about making society better all they are concerned about is depriving the rest of us of everything they can to feed their greed. They promote monopolies, they kill free trade, they lie and cheat and demand that they shouldn't be regulated or taxed. That is going to stop. And it will be stopped either with or without their co-operation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
00:00 on 15/11/2011
The only viable solution is to get the real culprits, the Bankers, to pay the time for their crime. Their assets, which were not earned by lawful or honest means, unlike their victims whom they robbed, should be seized and auctioned, and the proceeds redistributed throughout the hardworking British society. After all the Bankers wealth is accrued as a result of the Honest toil of working class people, which has enabled these parasites to live in the lifestyle to which they have become accustomed?????
18:10 on 14/11/2011
Excellent article.

"The prospect of our national debt being paid back by those who can scarcely afford it whilst the top income earners ..." In a nutshell, this is surely the core manifesto of "We are the 99%".
lastpost
see biography
13:03 on 14/11/2011
"the spirit of anti-capitalism."
Or the specter of capitalism corrupted? Much as communism co-opted, was a cause setting course for a calamity.

"our current coalition government was acting to improve social mobility"
Or the gipsy life, as its known to the new owners of the land.

"debt-busting policies"
Permitting an ideology that operates on the (over leveraged) principle of the money shark. With feeding frenzies only exacerbated by the incessant pouring in of bailout chum. Designed and destined to eviscerate a country. A predatory process that relies on achieving and maintaining a monopoly, rather than preserving free and fair competition.

"something needs to be done, the question however is what."
The master’s plan so far seems eminently logical. A section of the population is currently perfecting life-under-canvas, ahead of the rest of us. Obviously solar cell arrays can’t be supported by tent roofs. So such technology is rendered superfluous.

"all it needs is the will,"
and the reading thereof…
05:00 on 14/11/2011
I support the movement, but you should avoid quoting the NEF; some of their grander ideas are laughably bad both politically and (more worryingly, considering their set up) economically.

Unlike most 30-somethings, I don't frown on protesting youth, I love it - it's nice to see that the Generation Y that came after mine at uni have finally grown a pair and turned into students again.

The main problems I see in this country today, economically, come in the wake of 10 solid years of Labour tempering with very, very exact social constructs which governed the flow of career progression. For the first time in our history over 50% of people above 50 years of age are now unemployed. That is absolutely terrifying and it is far more worrying than the youth unemployment stats. Forcing everyone to go to university and then accept 30k of debt? Another economic disaster, most heavily falling on the working class.

These matters are dangerous in the extreme and we're now seeing the results of socialist economists tampering with social structures which took generations to establish. This is a problem of generational proportions, mark my words.
12:51 on 14/11/2011
spot on! I also think it's very convenient for the government of the day to allow the public to find a scapegoat for the prevailing crisis. In this case, while the banks are still getting a hammering from ordinary people, the government can heave a sigh of relief as the attention is drawn away from them. The banking crisis in 2008 was, as has been widely recognised, caused by banks, but brought about as a result of de-regulation by the Brown government.

On top of all that, the socialist government had embarked on a huge spending programme funding questionnable social reform, with no revenue stream in place to pay for it.
22:38 on 14/11/2011
"On top of all that, the socialist government had embarked on a huge spending programme funding questionna­ble social reform, with no revenue stream in place to pay for it."

That's EXACTLY the problem! I came from a working class London family, I worked hard to get to university, I did very well, and went into banking. I then left to run a trust and have a total career change.

The year after I went to university a veritably flood of students filled my halls of residence, there literally wasn't room to house them all and the university was cashing in while it could. Even then, at 18 years of age, we all knew this was very very bad.

Socialist economists never seem to recognise that economies are organic structures; they ignore the exceptionally delicate balances of age, experience, expertise and basically never ask "Who is going to pay for all this change we're making?"

This youth obsession with universities, academies, youth crime, youth x,y,z has cost us billions upon billions while shafting those who actually pay the bills - the mums and dads. It makes no economic sense at all.

Net result - Both the under 25s AND the over 50s are now screwed.
21:35 on 14/11/2011
Generational proportions indeed. Those 30k debt bundles are obviously widespread. As a fresh uni graduate they feel like debt bondage with current job prospects, and certainly will be for many, especially now.

But I anticipate this will simply ensure [debt burdened] labor for the economy can't migrate somewhere warm when the baby boomer generation begins retiring (end of the decade). Its a western world phenomenon coming to a head. Watch the immigration debate become about how to incentivise, rather than regulate.
22:45 on 14/11/2011
Good points. It's going to be an interesting decade for certain.

I just cannot believe the obsession with university, it's just weird. Our neighbour's son stop me in the street the other day to tell me he's off to uni. I was pleased for him until he told me what course he's doing..."Film Studies". Ordinarily I'd say great, but that boy is going to have 30k of debt and zero job prospects with a degree not even the film industry is that interested in. The biggest winners in this whole thing were the university departments with they swollen budgets and cash to burn on endless "conferences", "studies", "research". Anyone who was at university in the mid 90s remembers what a lazy bunch of champagne-communists most lecturers were (and I say that with fond remembrance).

Truth is, if my son were to say to me in this age "I want to go to uni" I'd basically say, "Make it a vocational degree or you're not getting a penny out of me". Maybe that makes me a philistine, but at least he'll be able to pay the bills when he graduates.