Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sue Thomason

GET UPDATES FROM Sue Thomason
 

Why Ruth Jones Only Has a 2% Chance of Staying Thin

Posted: 4/03/2012 23:00

Ruth Jones is the latest celebrity weight loss sensation. She joins Dawn French, Nigella Lawson and Pauline Quirk in the list of big girls who have very publicly gone from being 'happy in their skin' to drastically dropping the pounds, appearing in glamorous gowns showing off their new look. Each of them telling the story of how they did it, ranging from drastic liquid diets (Pauline Quirk) to 'sensible' calorie counting (Ruth Jones).

Their weight is their business, of course, but they are setting themselves up for a fall by talking about how they've done it - or by talking about it at all. Just like the vast majority of the celebrity weight losses before them (Oprah Winfrey, Natalie Cassidy, Kirstie Alley, etc) they only have a two per cent chance of keeping the weight off in the long term.

I'm not trying to p*ss on their parade - far from it. I'm trying to throw some rational thinking into the mix. And because I'm being rational I'm going to change that sentence about chances of success to a more sensible way of putting it, removing the emphasis from a side effect to the real problem:

These women only have a two per cent chance of maintaining in the long term the uncomfortable struggle against the overwhelming compulsion to overeat

If you understand anything about dieting (chances are you don't), you'll know about the balance of motivations. As long as weight loss is causing enough excitement, control over food is possible. And if you're getting loads of media attention (or attention from friends if you're not a celeb) over your weight loss and you're getting a buzz from it, then the excitement will make counting calories (or rejecting food for a dodgy meat flavoured milk shake) relatively easy. The weight loss is more important than the food. But because your brain is designed to require novelty and to slowly dampen down experiences that you have regularly, the buzz from the attention and approval is going to need to be increased for you to get the same hit from it.

This is all part of the survival mechanism. It's how the human race progresses. The woman who invented the wheel was probably very excited about rolling it around the ground. What fun it would have been when she only previously had boring old straight-edged rocks to push. If she hadn't finally got bored with the wheel - if her brain hadn't dampened down the excitement of it - she would never have been motivated enough to invent the cart. We'd all still be rolling rocks around the floor, laughing our heads off.

But your brain does dampen down your thrill at other people's reactions to your weight loss. And the media (and your friends) get bored of it and they stop talking about it. So just at the time when you need more admiration for looking good, you get less. Suddenly, you find yourself feeling a bit down and you can't explain why. You can't get excited about your weight loss any more. Your life has gone back to normal - you're just thinner.

So now you're faced with a cake. You know you shouldn't eat it. You argue with yourself. You then find you've eaten it. You feel guilty. You think: "I'll get back on my diet tomorrow." So you eat for the rest of the day.

The next day you're determined to get back on track. But you just can't get the feeling back. Then your husband says: "Let's get a Chinese." You think: "Oh, well, it's only one more day."

I think you know the rest.

What has happened, although you don't realise it, is after so long living with the weight loss being more exciting than the food, now the food has become more exciting than the weight loss. When food is more exciting than weight loss, which do you think is the winner in a battle against cake?

This is why celebrities, such as Oprah, Kirstie and Natalie, live to regret their public announcements about their weight loss and why they end up feeling a great deal of pressure to fight a battle they're swiftly and cruelly losing.

But this is a process that affects all of us. You don't have to be a celebrity to fall into this trap. But the celebration of temporary celebrity weight loss and the lure of the buzz and approval is exactly what snares us all into dieting.

Dieting doesn't work.

So celebrities, especially yo-yo dieting celebrities should refuse to talk about their weight loss for at least five years. For their own sake and for yours.

Read more in my bookEat Less Without Trying To Eat Less. And get a FREE chapter here.

www.foodphilosophy.co.uk

 
 
 

Follow Sue Thomason on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BeautifulMagUK

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
Ruth Jones is the latest celebrity weight loss sensation. She joins Dawn French, Nigella Lawson and Pauline Quirk in the list of big girls who have very publicly gone from being 'happy in their skin' ...
Ruth Jones is the latest celebrity weight loss sensation. She joins Dawn French, Nigella Lawson and Pauline Quirk in the list of big girls who have very publicly gone from being 'happy in their skin' ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:31 AM on 03/05/2012
I totally agree with Sue, I too wondered how long it would be before the 'after' photos return to the 'before' ones. This has happened so often I'm surprised so much fuss is still made over celebrity weightloss. I work with obese people who have lost 10stones only to regain 11stones. The ability this has to destroy the person's confidence and self worth is enormous and to do this whilst in the public eye must be even more destructive. Ruth, Dawn etc are beautiful people and always will be, I wish they could be fussed over for being who they are not just for the size of their bodies.
09:29 AM on 03/05/2012
I'm not trying to p*ss on their parade -
-------------------------------------------------
We promise not to think less of you if you say ''rain on their parade''. Only 2% of people who affect use of pointlessly vulgar language find success in it after a year.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sue Thomason
09:01 AM on 03/07/2012
Dear eric14, My answer to you is contained within this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_osQvkeNRM
10:52 AM on 03/07/2012
I consider Stephen Fry to be a national drudge rather than that ridiculous collocation ''national treasure.'' Like so many in the club called the BBC, as the programs get worse, the adulation increases. Swearing is admired by fans who believe vulgarity, satire and irony all have the same meaning. Perhaps is you use more profanities to brighten up your blogs, the BBC will spot you. They are always on the look out for people who are pointlessly vulgar.
photo
ginadeoliveira2008
Seen a shooting star tonight and I thought of you
10:22 PM on 03/04/2012
Can I infer from your last paragraph that a five-year success in keeping your diet plan means you're gonna make it? I've lost 48 pounds a year ago and until now have been able to keep them off. I don't give in, I don't relinquish. I simply only have home the kind of food I can eat. Whenever it's time to celebrate and I do eat something out of the ordinary, it's just that one thing and I'm back on track. I know it's a commitment for life now, I don't try to fool myself. And I check my weight every week.
09:30 AM on 03/05/2012
Well done. For me the worst words are ''exceptional treat.''
photo
ginadeoliveira2008
Seen a shooting star tonight and I thought of you
02:32 PM on 03/05/2012
I don't even look at the pictures!
11:59 AM on 03/13/2012
You sound like a very happy person...
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sue Thomason
09:10 AM on 03/07/2012
Hi Gina, There isn't enough space here to go into a decent answer to your question as it's a complex issue. But if you are a compulsive eater, dieting is unlikely to be the answer in the long-term. Weight is only a side effect of a psychological and biological problem. To make this even more confusing and unfortunate, compulsive overeating is caused by dieting. So what you're doing here is using the cause of your problem to solve it. Most people go in circles with dieting because of this. It's further explained in my book (see foot note of my post). There are balances of motivations that mean 2% of dieters can control their compulsion to overeat in the long term, but you wouldn't want to be one of them if you knew what those balances were!
photo
ginadeoliveira2008
Seen a shooting star tonight and I thought of you
03:15 PM on 03/07/2012
Thank you for kindly replying to my comment. Weight had never been a problem to me till menopause,from then on yes I have once already suceeded in losing that same amount and gained it back. It took me years to try dieting again. I'm pretty much adjusted to it now. I love fruits and vegetables, always have been a fan. Besides, I'm a great cook and I prepare real spicy and delicious food. But I guess what really matters is that I'm determined to never let food temptations at hand, and I know I'm in an age that can't allow for weight gain anymore. Compulsion is not a mistery to me as I'm a psychologist. Bottom line, you can count me on the 2%.
photo
ginadeoliveira2008
Seen a shooting star tonight and I thought of you
03:23 PM on 03/07/2012
I've replied to your kind answer but I suspect some of Huff's technicalities won't upload it. I thanked you and explained why I believed I have a very good chance to not regain weight, but it was such an enormous comment I wouldn't want to rewrite it, sorry. I wish in the end you'll be able to receive it.Just count me in your 2%, I'll be there.