It's fair to say, plenty of people have doubts about the current Labour frontbench. Nothing has convinced me more that they are incompetent than the leaking of a speech that Liam 'There's no money left' Byrne will give this week.
In this speech, fully endorsed by Ed Miliband, Byrne will attack "evil" benefit scroungers who are destroying William Beveridge's vision of the welfare state.
Leaving aside the irony of a man who charges the taxpayer, £400 a month for his food bill accusing others of being "evil" scroungers, is it just yet another crude attempt to outflank the Tories from the right? Just yet another demonstration of the current hopeless Labour plan being all tactics, no strategy?
No, this one is worse than all the rest. Why?
A senior Labour figure, with the backing of the Labour party leader, will attack the poorest and most vulnerable people in society - kicking them while they are quite literally down, in the middle of a recession. This is exactly the kind of attack by elites on ordinary people that the Labour party was founded to oppose.
Can you imagine the meeting where this plan was floated? And bear in mind, there will not have been one meeting, but several meetings. When you have a party where shadow ministerial statements have to be signed off in advance by the Leader and the Shadow Chancellor, this has had too many Oxbridge graduates, who think they are qualified to run the country, look it over and say "yes."
The policy at the core of the speech is to link eligibility for benefits to taxes paid. It absolutely boggles my mind that this policy could be proposed when the key problem of the moment is youth unemployment - young people have often never *had* the opportunity to pay income taxes. I know Youth unemployment is a big deal because Labour have been (rightly) banging on about it for months. It makes me question whether they even listen to their own statements anymore.
You would think Labour MPs would get this problem with the policy. You might also think, as they broadly represent constituencies in the old industrial heartlands, they might understand things like structural unemployment in welsh mining valleys, or in post-industrial cities like Sheffield or Manchester. Apparently not. They also miss the point that the poorest pay the highest share of deeply regressive taxes like VAT, the TV Licence and Sin taxes. To say the poor aren't paying taxes is simply facile.
Not one person thought to themselves, "Hang on, won't this upset our core support? Is demonising people that socialists should care about a good strategy long-term? Shouldn't we care about these people? What if Nye Bevan rose from the grave? What would he say?". Apparently no-one said any of these things.
Not one person even thought to check to see where this policy is on the spectrum of UK politics - in fact, this policy is FAR to the right of the Tory position on benefits. To find another party espousing the view that taxes are a vital precondition to benefits, you have to go all the way to the fringes of American politics - indeed to the Michelle Bachmann campaign in the US primaries. That's right. Labour is now to the right of mainstream American Republicans on the benefits issue, which is astounding.
Of course, none of this is to say that long term joblessness (and worse, multi-generational joblessness) isn't a serious problem. If there is work, people should do it. But at the same time, mechanisms to create that impetus to work need to actually take into account people's circumstances - and people who need the safety net of the benefit system need to be protected from stupid, overbearing, ill-thought out, headline-grabbing idiots like Liam Byrne.
Almost worse, even if you see this betrayal, this calculated attempt to win over Daily Mail readers, to leave behind those "evil" scroungers who pay no tax as the ends justifying the means - it's nothing but Fool's Gold. Labour is simply not going to win in a political fight on the ground of "who will be tougher on benefit claimants?" To quote Owen Jones - "it will fuel a prejudice that the Tories are most trusted to satisfy".
I know a huge amount of very smart, very committed socialists who would be brave enough to say all of these things to Ed Miliband's face. To speak the truth to power. Unfortunately, it seems no-one in the inner circle is willing to do so - or if they are, no-one at the top is willing to listen.
Miliband & Byrne sacrificing the founding principles of their supposed socialist party, attacking their own activists and supporters in order to win a short term poll bounce - which they won't even get. Remind me, why are they in charge again?
Follow Willard Foxton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/WillardFoxton
I wish I shared you faith in politicians, If there is no money left where do they always manage to cunjure it from for the dogma driven causes they believe in? Olympics, Wars, Royal Parades...any flag waving event never needs to tighten it's belt? Meanwhile the rest of the country can go to hell ,these fake events don't take the peoples minds of the peoples problems they just provide another excuse to take the elie's minds off the people's problems still further and use the publics money to pay for it as usual.
We are not in it together as Cameron says, instead the king is in the All Together as the public have wised up to bis bullshot.
David Cameron is deliberately dividing society and then pitting social groups against each other, we see him doing it between the private sector and public sector, able bodied people vs disabled people, the employed pitted against the unemployed, the haves against the have nots. David Cameron, George Osborne and Nick Clegg is forcing nurses, doctors, midwives, teachers, police, dinner ladies, cleaners etc to pay for the sins of the bankers and not just any old bankers, the bankers and hedge funds, the venture capitalists, the "Goldman Sachs" types who all donate £millions to the Tory party.
And let's not forget while it is absolutely right to attack benefit "fraud" that runs at just over £1.2bn,, that this figure ALSO covers overpayment of benefit in errors and that is NOT fraud. However, compare this to the fraudulent practice of tax avoidance, practised by bankers and other Tory minded people which runs into something like £22bn, perhaps the millionaires David Cameron, George Osborne and the useful idiot Nick Clegg may like to put that house in order BEFORE attacking vulnerable people who a have every right to claim.
Let's save the attacks for the real villains here and that is David Cameron and his Conservative party, it is not the Labour party.
Attacking the "evils" of fraudulently claiming benefits, is NOT the same as attacking those who have genuine claims and well you know it Mr Foxton.
Perhaps some of the people that have added comment here need to also make that distinction? This piece is nothing more than a thinly veiled attack on the leadership of Ed Miliband, which has been under sustained attack since just before Christmas when it finally dawned on Cameron that he is NOT to win the next election either.
This piece tries to coerce the reader into forgetting that it is the Tories led by Cameron, Osborne and Clegg who are mercilessly attacking benefit claimants, while lowering living standards,allowing the escalation of the TORY privatised utility bills and the Tory privatised railways leading to soaring rail fares by removing the Labour imposed rail-fare cap allowing rail fares to rise disproportionately against people's wages (risen 11%). Removing workers rights and human rights, giving bullying employers the right to bully their employees into submission without complaint. It is trying to divert the attention away from what the Conservatives are doing by attempting to paint he Labour leader and the Labour party in bad light, it is all just a political game to Tories, while real genuine people suffer the consequences of Cameron's divided society which he is deliberately breaking up more and more each day in order to get his Draconian austerity measures accepted.
And yes, I am a Tory - I do actually say so, as you rightly pick up. However, I'm of the opinion that this policy is divisive and wrong. If the Tories proposed it, I'd oppose it then as well. The reason I think it's astounding is because it's such a betrayal of what all my socialist friends have been campaigning against.
State pension *is* NI dependent, but even within that there are options to pay for "missing NI years" into your pension at a minuscule rate. Most people who have not worked will pay for the missing years (most commonly women who have taken 10-15 years off to raise children) as they approach retirement.
The current system is designed to be quite hard to fall through.
This is rather an aside to the point the article is making though.
people do not choose to be on benefits... they end up there, its not the life of luxury or ease, its heart breaking, depressing and financially terrifying. then add to this, the shame felt by actually having to apply for benefits... i was made redundant due to health and job cuts by local council, cuts brought about by the budget cuts demanded by this and previous governments. stop pointing the finger at the people that are victims of current policy and take a really good look at our society and the haves and the have nots!!!!
New Labour & the Tory ' Lib Dems have more or less the same policies
Privatise everything !!
Robin Hood in reverse
Without the support of the media this sustained attack on the poor wouldn't be affective
After all the scandals involving MP's expenses ; the handouts to banks ! the phone tapping
It sickens me that these failed politicians & media can attack the poor , the vulnerable , the elderly , the disabled in such an abusive manner
It's disgusting actually
Yes the benefit system needs a complete overhaul, but it needs to be done without prejudice.
Why should they walk out of school & be given cash in their pocket, which they have done nothing to earn?
Personally, I'd rather pay for the welfare state as a safety net - it's more humane, and probably cheaper in the long run.
All that aside our current situation is far from ideal, with the benefits system often discouraging people from returning to work. The system is so old and cumbersome that it needs a complete redesign. My preference would be for a citizen's income such as the Green Party proposes, although I'm no economist and not qualified to insist it would work!
It's a pity that Labour strategists don't see any other course of action than attempting to grab back some of the Tories' clothes, or that this kind of divisive rhetoric is considered 'centre-ground' in UK politics. All politicians share responsibility for having demonised the poor over decades, however.