Alistair Darling Attacks 'Deeply Unpleasant' Nature Of Gordon Brown's Premiership

Alistair Darling

First Posted: 04/09/11 11:29 BST Updated: 03/11/11 10:12 GMT

Alistair Darling has said there was a "deeply unpleasant" atmosphere at the heart of Gordon Brown's government after he and the then prime minister fell out over the severity of the 2008 economic crisis.

The former Labour chancellor was speaking on the BBC's Andrew Marr programme while promoting his new political memoir 'Back From The Brink: 1000 Days at Number 11'. The book characterises Brown's Downing Street operation as one of "chaos and crisis".

Darling served as chancellor under Gordon Brown from 2007 until 2010. In an extract featured in The Sunday Times he writes of Brown's time in Number 10: "It was a fairly brutal regime, and many of us fell foul of it."

In the book claims that Brown believed that the 2008 financial crisis would be over in six months and refused to sanction public spending cuts that the then chancellor believed necessary.

Speaking on Sunday, Darling suggested Labour could have won the 2010 election if Brown had set out a "credible" economic policy.

"The object lesson here is for any government to operate there needs to be complete unity at the top," he said. "My frustration is we could have got through this, we could have charted a political way through it."

He added: "You need to be united at the top but you also need a credible economic policy...it was so blidnlingly obvious that the two of us were at odds it hampered us at the election."

In 2008 Darling gave an interview to the Guardian in which he warned the economic crisis could be the worst the country had seen for 60 years. Following the interview he said Downing Street unleashed the "forces of hell" against him as Brown was unhappy with his analysis.

"It was deeply unpleasant," Darling told Marr. "I really don't mind, and relish, attacking Tories and them attacking me. What is so debilitating is when your own lot are doing it to you. It left a mark on me you really can't erase."

Asked why he did not try to force Brown to change his view or even try to push him out of power, Darling said he "had a residual loyalty [to Brown] which i found very difficult to overcome, we go back a long long way".

Extracts from the book also reveal Darling's frustration with Britain's bankers at the height of the financial crisis. He writes that at one point he was worried "they [the bankers] were so arrogant and stupid that they might bring us all down".

Seizing on the chance to remind the public of the discord at the top of the previous government, Conservative MP Greg Hands, a parliamentary aide to Chancellor George Osborne, said Labour had failed to learn from past mistakes.

"It shows Gordon Brown at the time failing to acknowledge the seriousness of the UK's economic position, a mistake being repeated now by his protégé Ed Balls, who's still calling now for more spending," he told Sky News.

But Andy Burnham, the shadow education secretary, said the coalition government was "supping the life out of the economy" by cutting public spending too quickly and by too much.

He told Sky News: "We believe the government is going too far and too fast".

Burnham, who was a candidate in the 2010 Labour leadership election, admitted there had been "too much factionalism" in the dying days of the last Labour government, but said he did not want to continue "raking over these coals".

"We're a new team and we are coming forward to rebuild the Labour Party," he said.

Darling is not the first senior Labour figure to criticise Brown's premiership in a memoir. Tony Blair, Peter Mandelson and Alistair Campbell have all put the boot in to the former prime minister.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Alistair Darling has said there was a "deeply unpleasant" atmosphere at the heart of Gordon Brown's government after he and the then prime minister fell out over the severity of the 2008 economic cris...
Alistair Darling has said there was a "deeply unpleasant" atmosphere at the heart of Gordon Brown's government after he and the then prime minister fell out over the severity of the 2008 economic cris...
Filed by Ned Simons  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:58 PM on 09/07/2011
For God's sake Darling, grow a pair! I'm tired of people working for people and then writing books saying how "deeply unpleasant" it was working for them (especially in your case, since you admit you loved dishing it out). If that's the way you feel, do the moral thing and leave and don't write a book--just because you think you have a book in you does not mean you have to write one. Saying that you are too important to leave is just arrogant.

And don't let the door hit you on the way out.
09:16 AM on 09/05/2011
Hindsight, is always much clearer than foresight. Take a look at the number of rank and file LibDem voters that now regret voting the way they did !!
07:23 AM on 09/05/2011
I don't know Mr. Darling, and I don't live in the UK and have little first-hand knowledge of the economic plight there. But, that said...

Is Darling really saying that in 2008, as the economic crisis was striking home with a vengeance, he was calling for CUTS to public spending?

And that he continues to call for CUTS to public spending even now?

That's ridiculous, especially coming from a member of the Labour Party. Even if one wants to disagree with aspects of Keynesian economics, sharp cuts in public spending at the onset of a very serious recession, or in the midst of it now, is simply foolish.

There's no other word for it, foolish. All that does is reduce economic demand even further, at a time when the economy is already teetering.

I'm not a fan of Gordon Brown but I would have been equally uncharitable to a Chancellor advising me to do such a thing.
09:05 AM on 09/05/2011
You are making the mistake of confusing 'the public sector' with 'the economy'. It is the latter which produces the means by which we can fund the former. To increase public spending without any economic growth is the politics of the poor house. However, I do agree that the cuts in the UK have been too fast.
12:00 PM on 09/05/2011
No, I'm not making any such mistake. I know the difference between the public sector, and the economy.

And it's basic Keynesian economics that when demand has been crippled by a recession, just about the only available treatment is to use the public sector to compensate.

That's why you keep hearing Paul Krugman, Robert Reich, even Christine Lagarde of the IMF telling folks this morning that they need to knock it off with the attempts to cut public spending in the midst of a recession, which simply stimulates the downward spiral in employment, wages, and demand... and to get busy stimulating demand in the economy.

Do you imagine Krugman, Reich, and Lagarde are mistakenly confusing the public sector with the economy?

Or, do you believe in utterly discredited "magical thinking" theories like Supply Side Economics?
photo
Mike Beckett
LibDem Cllr & Director of Caring for Business Ltd
12:14 AM on 09/05/2011
Labour imploding?
08:18 PM on 09/04/2011
I know its all true. Didn't Brown go on record and decree that the boom and bust economic cycle was 'done for'? Anyone that arrogant...well....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bud Budha
Why so quiet on Syria Mr. President?
06:23 PM on 09/04/2011
You see Aisha Qaddafi? She's fine!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Welcome to Nepal - the birthplace of Buddha
05:31 PM on 09/04/2011
In politics everybody wants to blame others to try to hide own mistakes and weakness. In spiritual world (not religion) spiritual persons try to see everything in cause and effect perspective and do not want to blame others.
04:38 PM on 09/04/2011
I would say from the number of posts on this item it is of no great importance to anyone other than Darling and his book sales numbers...

I wonder how many post you would have got if you had covered the News of the Government e-mails on the subject of up to 20 NHS hospitals having their management put in the hands of overseas companies....but then again thats not the sort of story huffington seems to want to cover these days.......Are you in the Tory's pocket?
06:59 PM on 09/04/2011
Spot on. The Huffington Post would be better off covering stories people outside the Westminster bubble care about. Why this story is regarded by the media as more important than the current state of the economy or the NHS reforms is beyond me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
12:23 AM on 09/05/2011
I agree with you on that, Andrew Griffiths, and I go to the UK sites to read and comment.  But I won't miss a chance to nail 'My future is the EU, I don't care about the rest of you' Brown.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FanaticRealist
Romney's Dog: 21st Century Schrodinger's Cat
12:33 PM on 09/04/2011
The problem for Darling - as well as Blair, Brown, Mandelson et al - is that, as much as I loathe the Tories, the whole New Labour establishment really have no credibility with regards to the economic effects of their policies in various areas.

Firstly, New Labour was far too enamoured of the power of the markets and banks for individuals to now suddenly turn around and criticise the financial services industry for greed and stupidity: IIRC, Brown made a comment at some point about high levels of personal debt – mortgages, credit cards, personal loans – being a price worth paying for economic growth.

Secondly, there was an arrogant belief that they had defeated the laws of macro-economic physics just as the investment banks arrogantly believed that they had – by the invention of CDOs, CDSs and other instruments – removed the reality of risk.

Thirdly, there was a foolish notion that social justice and equality could be purchased on a "buy now, pay later" basis in the space of two electoral terms as opposed to making sensible choices on national priorities (e.g. not taking part in wars based on fallacies and spin) and paying for improvements in education and health honestly by genuine economic growth instead of creating a complex web of PFI transactions that are now fleecing the UK taxpayer and enriching the financial institutions that are hypocritically lecturing us on the level of our national debt.
08:09 PM on 09/04/2011
Secondly, there was an arrogant belief that they had defeated the laws of macro-econ­omic physics just as the investment banks arrogantly believed that they had – by the invention of CDOs, CDSs and other instrument­s – removed the reality of risk.
-----------------------------------
Yes and yes again. During that time we lived in the Land of Smirks. The entire governing class were at it. Yet debt figures for UK Government, UK consumers, other governments, other consumers, were reported regularly. And many people were asking how it was going to be paid and they were ignored. And we still do not know if it can be paid.