Alcohol Price Hike To Tackle 'Acute' Problem Of Binge Drinking

Posted: 23/03/2012 12:05 Updated: 23/03/2012 12:05

Theresa May has said the problem of binge drinking is so "acute" that the government needs to bring in a minimum price for alcohol.

The government introduced its plans on Friday morning to bring in a minimum price per unit of alcohol as part of proposals intended to "turn the tide" against irresponsible drinking, which costs the UK an estimated £21 billion a year.

May said there was a "significant minority in this country who drink dangerously and cause disproportionate harm" leading to "drunken brawls", which made town centres no-go areas for many people.

"It needn't be like this," she told the Commons. "Alcohol can be consumed responsibility, a drink can be enjoyable not dangerous."

May said that that while the price of "dangerous drinks", such a special brew lagers would rise, it would not accept a price hike of a normal pint in a local pub.

"Those who enjoy a quiet drink or two have nothing to fear from our proposals," she said.

The home secretary told MPs that studies showed alcohol consumption was linked to its price. "Young people are particularly sensitive to changes in price, increasing alcohol prices lowers their alcohol consumption," she said.

Labour have indicated that they will support measures to bring in minimum prices, but the shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, has criticised the government for announcing the measures today.

Cooper said the government had rushed out the announcement ahead of schedule in order to distract the media from its negative coverage of Wednesday's Budget.

"The way that it has been done is a complete shambles," she said. "Why are we debating this today rather than on Monday when this was previously planned?"

It is highly unusual for a statement of this sort to be made to parliament on a Friday, when a large number of MPs will be away from Westminster in their constituencies.

Cooper noted that there had only been three government statements on a Friday in recent years, one on the Iraq War, one on swine flu, and one on Libya - all of which involved "serious issues around a national emergency".

"What is the national emergency today?" she asked. "The home secretary is being used a human shield for the prime minister and chancellor and she should have said no."

Quick Poll

Should There Be A Minimum Unit Price For Alcohol?

VOTE

However, the plans have been branded as "seriously misguided" by the drinks industry.

The British Retail Consortium's food director, Andrew Opie, said minimum pricing was effectively a "tax on responsible drinkers".

He added: "David Cameron is seriously misguided. It's simplistic to imagine a minimum price is some sort of silver bullet solution to irresponsible drinking.

"It's a myth to suggest that supermarkets are the problem or that a pub is somehow a safer drinking environment.

"It's retailers not pubs that have led the way on preventing under-age sales, providing unit labelling and funding the Drinkaware campaign.

"And retailers are active, founding participants in the Government's own health responsibly deal."

The prime minister's announcement did win some support though; Eric Appleby, chief executive of Alcohol Concern, said: "This is a victory for common sense.

"We cannot carry on with a situation where it's cheaper to buy cans of lager than a can of Coke."

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

Theresa May has said the problem of binge drinking is so "acute" that the government needs to bring in a minimum price for alcohol. The government introduced its plans on Friday morning to bring in...
Theresa May has said the problem of binge drinking is so "acute" that the government needs to bring in a minimum price for alcohol. The government introduced its plans on Friday morning to bring in...
Filed by Ned Simons  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:26 AM on 03/25/2012
tax on the tax tax lots giving up the ciggies so money has to come from somewhere me thinks.
09:52 PM on 03/24/2012
I admit that I do drink more than is recommended but I do so in the privacy of my own home. I do not go out on a Friday/Saturday night and create havock. I'm a pleasant drunk who just likes to get p!ssed of an evening after a very hard days work. I don't understand why I should contribute to the rabble who cause trouble and distress. I do admit that making the cost of alcohol prohibative would curbe my drinking activities but at the same time I feel that I am being tarred with the same brush as people that go out to deliberatly cause trouble due their alcohol consumption.
Lord Elpus
If you're going through hell, keep going
12:32 AM on 03/25/2012
Time for a nightcap methinks?
06:08 PM on 12/04/2012
It's mildly amusing how many people think that yet another tax will cure yet another problem. Binge drinkers are young with high disposible incomes. The people who will be hit are the people who have least money bringing up kids paying rents/mortgages and all the other associated bills.
I can practiclaly already hear the "health lobby" saying it's still too cheap all it requires in another 20p. Having already stopped low income people from driving and flying now it's they are going to be denied a drink.
It's too easy when you are priviged to know what is good for other people.
Sirguygisborne
08:42 PM on 03/24/2012
Tosh,,,its another tax scam.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
walkerhds
06:21 PM on 03/24/2012
what kind of toffee-nosed BS is this? Conservative gov't trying to implement a nanny-state, and enact a higher sin tax.. hypocritical sons of pox-eaten, slatternly, donkey-loving soiled doves all of them.
12:43 PM on 03/24/2012
What a load of B! If you think an alcohol price hike will cure the problem of binge drinking you are peeing in the wind. The only way to reduce binge drinking is start by billing all those that get into a Drunken Stupour with an Invoice for the Ambulanceand medical care provided by the Doctors and Nurses or the policing when they end up in the cells. When they wake up in the morning after a night of getting drunk with a bill for £500 they will soon learn to control there binge drinking. With the money the government get from these drunks they could help those Alcoholics who want to to give up their addiction to booze and majority who can control the amount they drink can continue without being ripped off by yet another Government tax!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokgee
Sabu.Satsang, Samsara, Solitude...
12:12 PM on 03/24/2012
Immediately after the budget, prices in the House of Commons bars were reduced, to come into line with their expenses increase. Now that is what we call good management....
08:34 AM on 03/24/2012
Yvette Cooper is treating people like fools. Yvette Cooper, enough is enough! How about introducing responsibility? Alcohol education should be an integral part of the national science to prevent and reduce alcohol. However, if some people behaved disgracefully, then they should have a responsibility for their actions. These people should pay it, at least £60 for the medical treatment to the NHS.‘’ taxing the poor to pay for the poor.’’ This regulation is illegal under European competition laws.
12:05 AM on 03/24/2012
The Tory despots want to cash in on 'binge drinking' it's as simple as that.
05:43 PM on 03/24/2012
YOU have hit the nail on the head IVOR
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keith w oliver
a dingo ate my micro-bio!!! >:O
11:33 PM on 03/23/2012
i don't think they're thinking about this correctly.

alcohol consumption, and the resulting behaviours, are going to occur whether they instill a min unit price per, or not.
it may not happen as often; it may cease to occur some places where it does currently, in certain instances, but likely not in others.
the thing is: virtually any alteration will result in similar patterns -- a give here and a take there. why go through the trouble of instilling a potentially dodgy situation to an already dodgy framework.
there are aspects outlined here that would be considered welcome changes, but it doesn't seem like there is enough confidence in the results to instill the changes, as of yet.

it almost seems like someone behind the scenes has been called out, and requested a change be made --
the result: *seems* as if it is forced ...
maybe not totally forced, but certainly not well thought out.
gov't is all too often making snap judgements that are poorly researched/thought-about, if thought-out at all.

point is: if it cannot be bettered, why make a change.
it needs to be bettered rather than just altered, for fear worse problems will arise, and then the only agency to turn to for aide will be the one that has made the recent mistake resulting in the implimentation of the problem you are about to ask them to try to fix ...... again.

that makes no sense
This comment has been removed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:39 PM on 03/23/2012
Min alcahol prices are just another way of handing bigger proffits to this governments masters the big supermarkets. And a way of the government making it up to them after the public outcry got their little poor kids stack shelves for you for no wages and no job con stopped. Tesco don't need to set up their own political party as they already completely control Tory party policy as it is.
This comment has been removed.
03:24 PM on 03/23/2012
MPs pushed for 24 hour drinking just a few years ago whilst in the influence of the of the drinks industry and against the advice of doctors who see the other side to drinking. The thesis was we are grown up and much of the EU has 24 hour drinking. Now MPs want to cut down drinking due to the downside effects such as rising liver failure in the young. Which way next?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
walkerhds
06:25 PM on 03/24/2012
if you are above the legal age to imbibe, who's business is it when you do so? I am sorry, but the world has changed, and not everything run 9-5p. other than maybe a need to clean out the bars (spray down the floors), there is no need for them to close, ever. The only reason there are "hours" are someone felt the need to impose their belief and (in)sensibility on everyone.
This comment has been removed.