Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andy Burnham

GET UPDATES FROM Andy Burnham
 

Reshaping the Education System is our Collective Challenge

Posted: 18/08/11 01:00 BST

From this morning, young people will begin to feel the full impact of this Government's education policies.

As A Level results are handed out, tens of thousands could miss out on a University place and will need to take agonising decisions about whether to reapply next year and face an extra £15,000 bill. And, next week, the publication of GCSE results will make a world without the Education Maintenance Allowance a painful reality. Some 16 year-olds might have to take a part-time job to subsidise studies; some might have to stay local rather than travel to the college of their choice; others might drop out of education altogether.

All this comes as the country is gripped by a polarised debate about the current generation and its prospects in the wake of last week's riots. If we are not careful, the language and tone of this debate could lead to a growing disconnect between young people and the political process.

The Prime Minister has said he is reviewing every aspect of Government policy in the wake of the riots. That statement is welcome. But David Cameron must mean what he says. On education, it is not enough for him to retreat to the Tory comfort zone of talking only about school discipline - important though that is. He must now have the courage to look again at the impact of unpopular policies on EMA and Higher Education, as well as the devastating cuts to the Careers Service. He must also ask what his Education Secretary has to say to the 50% or more of young people not planning to go to University.

I do not believe for one second that any of the young people who rioted did so because of the loss of EMA or higher tuition fees. But these policies have the potential to increase the number of young people, particularly in our less well-off areas, who do not feel part of society and are not on a constructive path in life.

On the whole, recent generations knew university was a realistic possibility - and affordable - if they met the required standard. For those planning to enter work, trainee schemes operated by large industries were in much more plentiful supply and entry requirements for them were well understood.

The truth is that young people are facing a much more challenging and competitive world than the one which faced my generation of politicians when we left formal education in the late 80s and early 90s.

The demise of large industry in many parts of the country has left a world with less certainty and structure. Today's school and college leavers are likely to have at least 10 different jobs in their working life. Unlike their parents and grandparents, they are more likely to work in smaller companies and will need to be all-rounders, able to adapt quickly to new situations. It is more likely that they will be employers as well as employees.

Our collective challenge as a society is to reshape an education system so that it prepares young people for this changed world and gives every young person a path to success within it. My worry is that Government policy is going in the opposite direction and making things worse.

Demand for university places has surged this year as many students decide against a gap year to avoid the higher fees that come in from 2012. The situation is made worse because, alongside this surge in demand, the government has cut the number of university places.

As they consider what to study and where, who is helping these young people? Who is giving them an insight into the professional world, helping them make contacts and making sure they can access the information to make the right choices for the future?

For many young people their families do this, providing role models, setting up work experience, helping with applications. Others don't have this support at home and need to depend upon the Careers Service. In the current context, with youth unemployment pushing one million, the Government's presiding over a melt-down in England's Careers Service is truly unforgivable.

Preventing a lost generation and wasting the talents of our young people will be one of the great challenges of our times.

The British Promise that Ed Milliband has spoken of - where children have greater life chances than their parents - will only be a reality if we face future challenges, and work to instil every young person with the knowledge and attributes they will need to succeed in the modern world.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
06:38 PM on 08/21/2011
THE SHADOW MINISTER IGNORES LEGISLATIVE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST GB/UK STUDENTS.

Governmental regulations legislate/encourage discrimination against GB/UK students while benefiting EU/foreign students.

♦  Government funding rules place a limit of 350,000 'home' students (unis are leveled a serious fine per person.) 

No limit on foreign students; UK students cannot apply for these slots.

♦  20 top universities will have no clearing for home students, but about half (including Edinburgh, Liverpool, Birmingham, Sheffield) are still searching for foreign students. 

♦ Universities depend on sky-high tuitions from foreign students to make ends meet, often as much as 10X the resident tuition. 

♦ EU students at GB schools are entitled to the lower UK tuition but also to UK student loans.  With repayment beginning at a salary level of £21K, many from poorer EU countries will never repay. 

♦  EU students aren't chased for repayment on UK student loans; the border service can't keep track of those still in UK, and trying to cross borders and get money from those working in France or Poland is problematic.  In 2009, 70% of those still in UK who should be repaying were not.

♦  Studying in Scotland is free for EU students (rising 17% a year), while Welsh, GB and NI students have to pay.  In 2000-1, the cost of EU students to the British taxpayer was £20Mn; in 2009-10, it was £75Mn.

Sources:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2026845/Britons-snubbed-universities-target-overseas-recruits-pay-20k-year.html#ixzz1VPIDZyughttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/7223022/Universities-admitting-more-foreign-students.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/mar/03/ministers-limit-international-students; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2026845/Britons-snubbed-universities-target-overseas-recruits-pay-20k-year.html#ixzz1VPPi9OCT; http://www.iaindale.com/posts/how-eu-students-are-fleecing-the-uk-taxpayer; http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/the_world_view/demand_for_university_spots_in_the_uk_higher_than_ever_fees_don_t_deter

The Shadow Minister spent hours writing this column: he deliberately avoided these critical issues.

IF YOU WANT MR. BURNHAM TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS ON HP, REPLY TO THIS POST AND DEMAND HE RESPOND POINT-BY-POINT. 
07:31 AM on 08/25/2011
It is just showing that High Education in UK is economic industry - to make more money and not to think about social future and where the students will work after graduation. And I agree with you this is dangerous for all young british generation!
10:22 AM on 08/18/2011
I agree the need to reshape the current education system, but that does not necessarily mean automatic entitlement to a subsidised university education for all. Labour targets of 50% of school leavers going to university were unrealistic, particularly in terms of the 'needs' of the economy. The world is changing, but university degrees are not the only way forward.
10:22 AM on 08/18/2011
Generally I agree with the articles; what other serious choice do students now have at the age of 18 apart from going to university in terms of gaining good career prospects?

Go straight into the world of work? Apart from retailers which firms offer positions with good advancement prospects to those with 'only' A levels? And while certain companies still offer high quality apprenticeship programmes for school leavers they are in the minority.

Start your own business? With previously reported poor standards of teaching in business studies, cut funding for advice centres and the difficulty of gaining working experience beforehand, not to mention the difficulty of gaining business loans even for relatively well established SMEs this would be a tough option for an 18 year old.

Gain qualifications through your local college? Again subsistence funding while studying for many of these has been cut, as have places on many courses and the prestige of many have been decimated by the rise of Universities teaching similar courses and offering honour degrees at the end.

While I can’t offer any solutions to these problems (and I’ll openly state that I generally support the government in the necessity of spending cuts) something has to be done.
10:10 AM on 08/18/2011
The pressure on students today is appalling, they have had to get higher grades to stand still. They face higher fees next year and a brief look at clearing shows that many universities are not offering clearing at all this year - this year has been betrayed. Some of them applied before the fees went up, that information might have informed their choices but they were trapped in the system by November.
09:08 AM on 08/18/2011
An interesting article Andy but please remember your party introduced Tuition fees in the first place.

Although many young people (including myself) passed our A-Levels and had a clear way to get into University; some of us fell down. The universities were too full, people with pathetically lower grades than me were getting into university to do stupid courses such as Script Writing.
I could not get into Uni without having to leave my country, yes I was only accepted in Wales! So I put education behind me and went into Admin.

Why can we not scrap stupid courses and use that money to fund important courses? Get more lectures open - let more people study Physics or Medicine with the money gained from bloody 'Script Writing'.
10:07 AM on 08/18/2011
Regarding the idea of scrapping niche courses; I'm pretty sure money paid by students of these courses which are relatively cheap to run is used by universities to subsidize courses such as Physics or Medicine which have far higher costs in terms of staff, resources and specialized equipment.
11:51 AM on 08/18/2011
You make a valid point.
But there are so many niche courses, too many actually and these courses lead people to nowhere. The Government PAY for these courses (because Students Loans is the Government) and the people who passed rarely get a fantastic job with a diploma in Script Writing. So they will work in retail for £12,000 a year and never pay back their course.
lastpost
see biography
08:55 AM on 08/18/2011
"not careful, the language and tone of this debate"
Quantify “care” and “debate” . I see little evidence of either. Rather, a failure in the duty of care as a consequence of the almost complete absence of debate.

"The Prime Minister has said he"
embraces transparency.
1. Suppressing the findings of an investigation into illegal acts of torture.
2. Preventing the release of Maggie’s statements relating to a mass human tragedy.
3. Blocking entry of the citizenry into the halls of power, to police those already twice disgraced places of supposed democracy.
4. Pick your own.

"I do not believe for one second that any of the young people who rioted did so because of the loss of EMA or higher tuition fees."
What do believe those who rioted previously about tuition fees (see Nick for further details) were rioting about? The price of fish maybe.

"The truth is that"
truth is deemed extinct.With no substantiated sightings for some considerable period now.

"Our collective challenge as a society is to"
get a grip on that disparity between unique individual renditions of reality and actual reality.

"Demand for university places has surged"
Yet have the interweb, a virtual proxy.

"a lost generation"
narcotised on cheap ersatz “democracy”.

"The British Promise that Ed Milliband has spoken of"
is just that, a promise. As ethereal as an EU referendum

"a reality"
only if we introduce true democracy. Well Andy, are you part of that solution or part of this problem?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
07:05 PM on 08/21/2011
Latpost, I was a little angrier than you at Burnham; you might want to read my response at the top of the thread.  Faved.
08:38 AM on 08/18/2011
I am so agree with tis article. This voice have to be call to every country. The young generation is feeling so confused: Why to go to Uni? and spend years to be an engineer? Nobody guarantee а job. "Reshape an education system" . And reshape it in our social awareness that society needs all their parts and responses for them and every individual is making all his affords to be effective human being on this planet. A person cannot exist separately from society. We are deliberately built in a way that obligates us to live among other people. Educate, not only children, even adults how to live in this new world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
07:13 PM on 08/21/2011
What about the invisible but sizeable discrimination against UK/GB students toward EU/foreign students? (I posted on this at the top of the thread.)  That's the setting in which UK/GB children are raised, and this 'globalist' concept isn't helping UK, just like the EU 'economic government' and the proposed 'financial transactions tax' will place much of the burden on this non-€zone country.
07:25 AM on 08/25/2011
I am not in UK, I want the education will be reorganized in all countries. It is not responding for quick changing life - the old system is not flexible enough. Like NHenfrey1 sad : "Why can we not scrap stupid courses and use that money to fund important courses? Get more lectures open - let more people study Physics or Medicine with the money gained from bloody 'Script Writing'. "

Another thing that my kids are different then my generation and I do not know if the High Education give them an advantage.