" [Through] these cruel, wanton, indiscriminate bombings of London... He hopes, by killing large numbers of civilians, and women and children, that he will terrorize and cow the people of this mighty imperial city... Little does he know the spirit of the British nation, or the tough fibre of the Londoners."
These words, spoken by prime minister Winston Churchill in September 1940, are but a distant memory to many British citizens today. And yet, they remind us of times when Londoners spent countless nights seeking cover from aerial attacks in shelters and tube stations.
In the years since Israel pulled out of Gaza, over one million Israelis have been forced to live under similar conditions, seeking refuge in bomb shelters as a result of thousands of Hamas rocket and mortar attacks. While the rockets targeting Israeli civilians - men, women, and children - do not carry as deadly a payload as that of the German bombs of World War II, their aim is equally sinister and illegitimate: to instill fear in the hearts of Israelis and undermine their right to live in a free and independent state.
In recent months, over one seventh of Israel's population have found themselves within range of rocket fire, having to live their lives within 15-30 seconds of the closest bomb shelter in case the siren sounds. Children have been unable to attend school for extended periods, growing up experiencing the trauma of life in the danger zone. Showing remarkable courage and restraint in the face of this intolerable reality, these Israelis have tried to maintain a semblance of normalcy, while the Israeli government continued to hold out hope that a non-military resolution of the situation might be reached.
However, over time, not only have the assaults become more frequent, but the range of sophisticated rockets, smuggled in from Iran, Sudan and Libya, has increased. The Iranian-made Fajr 5 missile has a range of 75km, putting some 4.5 million people - over 50% of Israel's population - in the kill zone.
Last week, for the third time in a month, the civilians of southern Israel came under attack from the Gaza Strip. An anti-tank missile was fired at an army jeep on the Israeli side of the border fence, injuring four IDF soldiers. Subsequently, over 120 rockets were fired at Israeli civilians.
It was only following this sharp escalation that Israel embarked upon Operation Pillar of Defence in order to end the indiscriminate rocket barrage from Gaza and to cripple Hamas' ability to launch terror attacks on our citizens.
The need for action was clear, but any such operation is highly complex. Israel is painfully aware that Hamas not only directs its missile attacks against Israeli civilians but it also, cynically, hides its stockpiles and missile launchers behind Palestinian civilians. This creates an enormously difficult challenge for Israel, which has to defend its citizens while doing its utmost to avoid injuring the innocent Palestinians being used as shields by the terrorists. Israel devotes
enormous effort to these challenges. These efforts include using, where possible, the Israeli developed 'Iron Dome' technology to intercept rockets in flight, and dropping thousands of leaflets and making tens of thousands of phone calls, urging Palestinian civilians to leave areas of Hamas activity for their own safety. Moreover, refusing to ignore the plight of Gaza's civilian population, which suffers under the yoke of Hamas rule, Israel has transferred nearly 100 trucks loaded with food and medical supplies into Gaza since the operation began and has also afforded medical treatment to 26 Gazans who are being cared for in Israeli hospitals.
To date the operation has dealt a serious blow to the Hamas terrorist organization, including successfully targeting its military leadership and putting out of action a large proportion of the long-range missiles in the arsenal of Hamas and its fellow terrorist organisations.
This is in itself a significant success. But in itself it will not be sufficient to sustain a long term ceasefire and restore normal life to the citizens for Israel. For this to happen, Hamas itself must recognise that terrorising Israelis will no longer be tolerated, by Israel or the international community.
Follow Daniel Taub on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@IsraelinUK
Peter G Tatchell: Ceasefire Will Only Hold if There Is Justice for Palestine
Tell me Mr Taub what do you regard as "large numbers of civilians, and women and children"? Perhaps you would care to lay out the casualty figures for both sides of this conflict.
I heard your interview in TV a few minutes ago in which you referred to military necessity because of the tactics of Hamas. Tell me Mr Taub if the roles had been reversed would the Israeli Defence Force site all of it fire power and limited armaments away from built up areas at a base which it could not defend and wait for Hamas's air force to pound it into dust?
Hamas's tactics are born out of necessity. I'm sure that it would like to take on the IDF on equal terms but in comparison to the IDF it is gnat. Terrorism is the war of the weak, war is the terrorism of the powerful.
Israel, you are the one leading an illegal military occupation. You are the one continually stealing land and water in direct contravention of the Geneva Accords. You are the one humiliating Palestinians daily. You are the one practicing collective punishment on an entire population. You are the ones practicing a worse-than-apartheid policy. You are the ones that bulldoze homes while families are still inside. You are the ones confining a population to the world's largest open-air prison. You are the ones denying food and medicine to children. You are the ones breaking ceasefires with military provocations. You are the ones with an actual illegal nuclear weapons program.
Your behavior is a blight on the conscience of humanity. If you desire peace, then withdraw your military from all occupied lands, tear down your apartheid wall, dismantle your network of Jew-only highways and military installations in Palestinian territory, stop your racist apartheid policies and join the modern world. Continue to abuse and commit horrors against the Palestinians at your peril. Make peace now, or your pay for it with your children's future.
The state of Israel should take all necessary steps to secure its citizens against murderous attacks against its population.
Hamas needs to develop a posture of peace for Gaza. Then all blockades can end.
Are you not even aware that Israel is the occupying military power? Israel is the aggressor, it was founded by "clearing" thousands of Palestinian villages to make way for Israeli settlers.
Palestinians are human being too, and they have the right to be free of the yoke of racist Israeli rule, free from the fear that their homes might be bulldozed on top of them because some fundamentalist Israeli wants Palestinian land for himself.
If Israel does not change it's despicable behavior soon, it will find itself isolated in an increasingly hostile region. Arabs and Muslims will not tolerate Israel's massacres and dehumanizations much longer. They would be wise to take the peace initiatives offered them sooner rather than later.
What you have said is an insult to civilians who died in world war two and an insult to those who died in the concentration camps - who is bombing/blitzing/attacking in Gaza?, how many kids/innocents have been killed?
The sympathy stuff pulling the nazi/holocaust/nazism comparison out of the hat and saying to people 'oh look poor us' is not going to work, is not working and will not work - if anything people will look at your cheap shots at sympathy as pathetic.
Instead, they would rather have snipers assassinate children playing football and steal more land. The region is changing. Israel will soon reap what it sows.
Whilst disagreeing with a lot Israel has done (and I don't like Netanyahu at all) the world has not come forward to guarantee Israels borders pre 1967, and even if it did, if you were an Israeli, would you trust what people said? (The Balkans come to mind). They are, and always have been, surrounded by enemies.
The size of Israel is minute. I believe it is about twenty miles wide as its narrowest point. It is one twelfth the size of the United Kingdom. I went from almost one end to the other in a day.
Hamas seems to have put its rocket launchers amongst the population, to ensure that maximum casualties are caused, to make Israel seem the aggressor and oppressive. Sometimes they are. But not this time, according to independent reporters
Israel are the face of a tyranny that they are laughably claiming to face.
It's strange that you here nothing from this bunch of crooks when mentioning the viral spread of illegal settlements into Palestinian land, and the casual destruction of Palestinian infrastructure, assassinations and indiscriminate shelling.
Get out of Palestine & stop murdering children, israel is a terrorist state carrying out genocide in Gaza.
Viva Palestine!
TL;DR: The Second World War is not happening again, anywhere.
There is no second Hitler.
There is no second Churchill.
The inescapable conclusion, if this theory is even partly correct, is that anyone who invokes the Second World War to justify the actions of his masters in government is making statements which vary quite broadly from facts which he cannot help but know.
I have been told by those who know more about moral theology than I do, that there is a simpler, shorter description of these statements. People who care about such things call them "lies."
Not "errors." Lies.
Not "differences of opinion." Lies.
Not "the deeper, truer understanding which comes from being the actual victim of these vicious, unceasing acts of terror." Lies.
Examples:
"Saddam Hussein is Hitler!"
LIE
"George Walker Bush is Churchill"
LIE
"Civil rights activists are Neville Chamberlain!"
LIE
"Random, ineffective rocket attacks from a starving, blockaded city is the London Blitz!"
LIE
Godwin's law
Godwin observed that, given enough time, in any online discussion—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably makes a comparison to Hitler and the Nazis.
There are many corollaries to Godwin's law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself than others. For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and *whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress*
And it seems anti-Jewish sentiment is the theme, but not the more broadly controvertible tyranny of extremists over a weak and powerless minority.