POLITICS
16/06/2013 15:42 BST | Updated 16/06/2013 18:04 BST

Syrian Rebels Should Not Be Armed Putin Warns Cameron Ahead Of G8 Summit

Splits between Russia and the West burst into the open on Sunday when president Vladimir Putin issued a blunt warning not to arm Syrian rebels who "eat the organs" of their enemies.

Following talks in Downing Street with David Cameron, he said the brutal behaviour of the rebels was inconsistent with the "humanitarian and cultural values" of Europe.

While he strongly defended the supply of arms by Moscow to the "legitimate" government of Syrian president Bashar Assad, he also stressed that he wanted to achieve a diplomatic solution to the crisis.

putin cameron syria rebels

Putin met with Cameron in Downing Street

He said that he believed the G8 summit, starting tomorrow in Lough Erne in Northern Ireland, was the "one of the most appropriate means" to seek an end to the conflict.

At a joint news conference Cameron acknowledged there were "big differences" between them on who was to blame for the conflict but insisted they could be overcome.

Putin, who has made no secret of his opposition to US president Barack Obama's plans to start sending arms to the rebels, was unsparing when he was asked about previous comments by Cameron that those who armed the regime had "the blood of the children of Syria" on their hands.

LIKE HUFFPOST UK POLITICS ON FACEBOOK | FOLLOW US ON TWITTER

"The blood is on the hands of both parties.There is always a question as to who is to blame for that. One should hardly back those who kill their enemies and eat their organs," he said, referring to an incident when a rebel fighter was filmed taking a bite out of the liver he had cut from a dead Syrian soldier.

"It is hardly in relation to the humanitarian and cultural values Europe has been professing for centuries."

Putin was also unrepentant about supplying weapons - including sophisticated anti-aircraft missiles - to the Assad regime.

"Russia supplies arms to the legitimate government of Syria in full compliance with the norms of national law. We are not breaching any rules," he said.

In contrast, Cameron, who reiterated that he had not yet taken a decision to follow the Americans in arming the rebels, said Britain was simply seeking to support the "centre ground of decent moderate Syrians".

He said he believed it was possible for Russia and the West to overcome their differences and make progress in the talks at Lough Erne.

Story continues after slideshow...

Photo galleryDavid Cameron Meets Vladimir Putin See Gallery

"Where there is common ground is we both see a humanitarian catastrophe, we both see the dangers of instability and extremism, we both want to see a peace conference and a transition," he said.

"So the challenge for the G8 and for this process is to try and put aside some of the differences and focus on the common ground where we both want to see a peace process, a transition, take place."

The Russian president also indicated that despite the US announcement last week, the G8 was the right forum in which to try to move forward.

"I fully share prime minister's view that this is one of the most appropriate means of resolving the Syrian issue. The issue can be resolved only by political and diplomatic means," he said.

Cameron had invited Putin to Downing Street ahead of the G8 specifically so they could discuss the Syrian issue which has emerged as the primary bone of contention between them.

The meeting opened with a moment of reconciliation, with the two leaders handing medals to the veterans of the Arctic convoys who helped keep Russia supplied during the dark days of the Second World War.

Earlier the prime minister received a fresh warning that even if he chose to join President Obama in arming the rebels he could find his path blocked in Parliament.

A succession of MPs from all parties lined up to voice their deep opposition to any such move.

Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg was non-committal about the prospects, telling BBC1's The Andrew Marr Show: "We clearly don't think it is the right thing to do now otherwise we would have decided to do it."

Former Liberal Democrat leader Lord Ashdown, however, was more outspoken saying it would be "an act of very considerable folly" that risked drawing Britain into a wider sectarian struggle between Sunni and Shia Muslims.

"It is scarcely possible to overestimate the danger of this moment. The consequences of getting the decision wrong, of misjudging the position of the Russians and the Russians misjudging ours could be very, very grave indeed," he told Sky News.

"We are now being inadvertently - and stupidly in my view - instrumentalised into supporting the Sunnis on the one hand while the Russians are being instrumentalised into supporting the Shias. I don't believe that it is sensible for us to be contributing to that process."

Tory backbencher Julian Lewis said it could be "suicidal" leading to extremist elements among the rebels gaining control of the regime's arsenal of chemical weapons.

"In the past we have gone to war because we feared that weapons of mass destruction might fall into the hands of al Qaida and it would be absolutely crazy to assist al Qaida to get their hands on the very sorts of weapons we must keep away from them at all costs," he told the BBC Radio 4 World This Weekend programme.

For Labour, shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander said there was "unease" across Westminster at the prospect of supplying arms to the rebels.

"For months Labour has called on the Government to answer basic questions about their approach, such as how would the prime minister ensure that weapons supplied did not fall into the wrong hands and how would this step help to de-escalate the conflict rather than prolong it?" he said.