Robert Webb has slammed Russell Brand over his call for revolution, encouraging him to read George Orwell's 1984 and saying the comedian's plans would inevitably lead to “death camps” and “repression”.
Webb, writing in the New Statesman on Wednesday, accused Brand of political "timidity" for not voting and suggested that he should better educate himself by reading "some fucking Orwell".
Webb, best known as one half of the comedy double act Mitchell and Webb, castigated Brand for an essay he wrote as guest editor of the New Statesman, which he ended by stating: "I will never vote and I don't think you should either."
TOP STORIES TODAY
Webb's destruction of Brand's argument comes after Jeremy Paxman accused the comedian of being a "trivial man" in a fierce exchange on Newsnight last week.
It also follows the journalist Robin Lustig branding the comedian "not only daft but dangerous," in an exclusive blog for the Huffington Post UK.
Brand wrote that “imagining the overthrow of the current political system is the only way I can be enthused about politics”.
He dismissed politicians as “frauds and liars” and the political system “as nothing more than a bureaucratic means for furthering the augmentation and advantages of economic elites”.
Writing a response piece in the current edition of the magazine, the Peep Show actor criticised Brand for effectively "telling a lot of people that engagement with our democracy is a bad idea".
Webb said Brand's article had had the opposite desired effect on him, as he decided to rejoin the Labour Party after reading it.
“What were the chances, in the course of human history, that you and I should be born into an advanced liberal democracy? … That we can say what we like, read what we like, love whom we want; that nobody is going to kick the door down in the middle of the night and take us or our children away to be tortured?” he said.
“The odds were vanishingly small. Do I wake up every day and thank God that I live in 21st-century Britain? Of course not. But from time to time I recognise it as an unfathomable privilege.
"On Remembrance Sunday, for a start. And again when I read an intelligent fellow citizen is ready to toss away the hard-won liberties of his brothers and sisters because he's bored.”
He said that one lesson from history was that revolution “ends in death camps, gulags, repression and murder.”
“In putting the words 'aesthetically' and 'disruption' in the same sentence, you come perilously close to saying that violence can be beautiful,” Webb said.
Webb expressed particular concern in Brand encouraging his mostly young fans not to vote. Brand was giving politicians “the green light to neglect the concerns of young people because they've been relieved of the responsibility of courting their vote”.
“Why do pensioners (many of whom are not poor old grannies huddled round a kerosene lamp for warmth but bloated ex-hippie baby boomers who did very well out of the Thatcher/Lawson years) get so much attention from politicians?” he wrote. “Because they vote.”
The comedian praised Brand for being "a wonderful talker" but wryly noted that "on the page you sometimes let your style get ahead of what you actually think".
Webb concludes by questioning Brand's avowed belief in God and his desire to find a "luminous connection" beyond himself through revolution. "We tried that again and again, and we know that it ends in death camps, gulags, repression and murder. In brief, and I say this with the greatest respect, please read some fucking Orwell."
Chloe Smith vs Paxman (skip to 6:20)
This isn't so much a car crash of an interview, more a head-on collision between the last two spaceships ferrying mankind away from a doomed planet Earth thereby wiping out our entire species. It's that bad.
Michael Howard vs Paxman
Vintage Paxman this, a veritable Grand Cru of an interview. Howard is asked a whopping 14 times "Did you threaten to overrule him?", (referring to a meeting with Derek Lewis, head of Her Majesty's Prison Service). Evasive is not the word...
Bill Shorten vs Agenda
Showing unflinching party loyalty that would have made Stalin proud, Bill Shorten sacrificed his own opinions to subscribe to a stance he hadn't even heard yet. "I haven't seen what she said but let me says I support what it is that she said." Good for you Bill, good for you...
Brown vs Marr
Asking the PM if he's on drugs? Brave Marr, very brave...
Brown vs Boulton
For one glorious second it almost looks like the two gents are about to come to actual blows, which lets face it, would be an utterly fantastic wonder. My money would be on Brown.
Brown (again) vs Himself
Watching Brown's face, not to mention election chances, crumble live on TV is a behemoth of a spectacle, Shakespearean in it's utter tragedy.
Lord Pearson vs His Own Manifesto
A monumental failure to misunderstand the fundamentals of politics.
Diane Abbot vs Neil
Superb piece of grilling here as a continually smirking Portillo looks on clearly enjoying every squirming second...
Karl Rove vs The Rest Of The World
When Fox News calls the election for a Democratic president you know it's time to give it up...
Chairman Nhlanhla Nene vs Gravity
Sometimes negotiating the interviewer is the easy part.. The best thing about this clip is the first crack 11 seconds in. From that moment on this unfortunate gent has a look in his eyes of someone who knows he's doomed...