Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Fran Singh

GET UPDATES FROM Fran Singh
 

Black Mirror: Brooker's Disdain for Absolutely Everything is Wearing Thin

Posted: 06/12/2011 00:00

Last night saw the airing of Charlie Brooker's National Anthem, the first installment of his Channel 4 three-part comic drama Black Mirror. The story takes place over one day and focuses on the online hivemind reaction as a fictitious princess is kidnapped. Her captors have only one demand, that the Prime Minister have sex with a pig on national television. What aimed to be an examination of the "darker side of our gadget addiction" disappointingly and predictably just ended up as Brooker telling us yet again how thick we, the general public, all are.

I didn't have high hopes. Of late I've avoided Brooker. I find it's not the best way to start Monday, reading about why I am such a sniveling moron. A moron for enjoying a Christmas advert. A moron for going to Glastonbury. A moron for not watching television in the "correct" aspect ratio.

I am a fan of Brooker and he is an undoubtedly brilliant and skilled writer but as the years have gone on he has become more and more genuinely misanthropic. The same drum banged a thousand times. "You are all stupid." There's a limit to how many times I can be told.

National Anthem was not all bad. It was compelling from the start and kept a good pace throughout. The actors, especially Rory Kinnear as Prime Minister Michael Callow, were committed in spite of such a far-fetched plot. During one scene where the Prime Ministers press team are assessing how far the story has leaked, the line "The Guardian are running a f**king live blog and a short think piece on the historical symbolism of the pig," is reason alone for me to give it another chance next week.

Despite the unsubtle premise it did have elements of realism. An inconceivable idea, that over an hour became almost believable. Yes, a programme about the prime minister shagging a pig, had elements of realism. We've all seen the Twitter mob in action and the power of social media in shaping world events. We've all probably been part of the Twitter mob and uncomfortably questioned what our over-excited ramblings have done.

Part of the appeal of the "Cult of Brooker" has always been, from Nathan Barley to his columns on reality TV, that we join in, mocking the subjects, foolishly thinking we are in someway above it. We feel better that we aren't the idiots depicted or part of an enlightened gang now we've seen the error of our ways. But it's wearing thin and predictable. I long for the day he attempts something new.

Despite the better elements of National Anthem I couldn't get away from that lingering undercurrent. The notion that the general public is terrible. Unlike the fantastic Dead Set, Charlie Brooker takes an altogether more sneering tone at the faceless public as a whole.

Naturally, like the idiots we are, we all took to Twitter to discuss it. It was depraved, genius and dark according to the hashtag. I couldn't see it. It wasn't revolting, it wasn't that shocking, it was exactly what I've come to expect from Brooker.

 

Follow Fran Singh on Twitter: www.twitter.com/fransingh

FOLLOW UK ENTERTAINMENT
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:12 PM on 12/26/2011
If it was supposed to be a commentary on social media and spectacle - it didn't really wash. Social media is simply a more efficient way of gossiping in the way that all technology makes the things we already do easier and more efficient.

As a discussion of what people, given the chance, would be willing to watch, I think the director has a poor grasp of history. We used to take a picnic to public hangings and watch them like a day out with the family. Our appetite for witnessing the obscene isn't new. It's always been like this.

There was, however, one brilliant idea in the piece, voiced by the PM's wife: she says "They've already all imagined you doing it."

This statement actually did have some depth. Because beneath it is the question of how blithely we are willing to destroy our own institutions.

Somewhere, there is a better writer with a far cleverer story with which to explore that question.
04:49 AM on 12/09/2011
Charlie Brooker is coasting now he's rich and hangs out with famous people all day.
07:38 PM on 12/08/2011
Why isn't there a 'crap' reaction button for this article ?
11:43 AM on 12/08/2011
actually, most of what he says is spot-on. It's black because the world is that stuffed. This means that happy smiley people get irritated by his negativity.
Funny how your reaction to his is like a really really bad knock-off - say 4th generation albanian Gucci - of his style. You had to try to be like him to complain.
06:03 PM on 12/07/2011
This is a bit of a non-review with not much substance to it. Just takes personal issue with the general public portrayed as voyeuristic idiots, and that the PM has to have sex with a pig. Tell us something new. It's not what you've come to expect? Meh. I thought it was great, can't remember the last time social media hysteria was satirised so well if at all.

As with the 'aspect ratio' thing, you are aware Brooker works in television production and direction? I don't even work in TV and it bothers me, so someone working first-hand with it will obviously get annoyed by a show being shown the incorrect way.
This comment has been removed.
01:59 AM on 12/07/2011
Bonjoours Comment nous devons tous fair un commentaires pour voir ce film et bien je fais comme vous . J’espere que ce film est supere je pence que oui vue comment les personnes en parle !!!!!
01:58 AM on 12/07/2011
je ve le voir a donf puré de crotte de zut lol mdr ptdr je ve le voir a donf puré de crotte de zut lol mdr ptdr je ve le voir a donf puré de crotte de zut lol mdr ptdr je ve le voir a donf puré de crotte de zut lol mdr ptdr - http://www.tradecanadagoose.com/
10:16 PM on 12/06/2011
I thought it made a point that none of the leaders would actually lead on anything. Rather than make a decision based on moral stance or personal circumstance, the politicians made their decisions based purely on public opinion. The closed-loop of action, feedback, reaction could only have one possible outcome in the circumstances, whereas had the leader made his stand at the beginning then the outcome would have been different for him and the nation but not for the "princess£ victim.
02:43 PM on 12/06/2011
I'd read some negative reviews but was surprised to like this quite a bit. Yes, the premise is outlandish, but I thought it was handled with taste, sympathy and an eye for ambiguities. This wasn't the easy-target satire it could have been. In this respect, I'd very much agree with Thomas Platt's take on the episode.
photo
the grange gorman
Rachel Corrie is the greatest person since Lennon
02:11 PM on 12/06/2011
I enjoyed Black Mirror , it showed how ridiculas the people who work in the media are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
01:55 PM on 12/06/2011
I thought it was much less misanthropic than I'd have expected of Charlie Brooker, actually. The message I got from it was a lesson in how easy it is for a crowd (and that's all Twitter et al really are) to get carried away with an idea without truly considering the consequences. The British public had geared themselves up for a spectacle - ostensibly in the name of saving a life but at least partly to be a part of the show - but hadn't fully grasped the horror of what was happening before it became "real". I think that's a worthy and relevant lesson when the size of crowds has reached Twitter proportions.
01:13 PM on 12/06/2011
This article reminds me exactly of the kind of teenagers that used to write into Charlie Brooker’s ‘Sick Notes’ Column in PC Zone, back in the late 90s, complaining because he insulted their love of Quake II, or Marilyn Manson, or football, or something.

I’ve always thought with Brooker, like Yatzhee or Stephen Wells, you don’t get the laugh from what they’re insulting as they usually go for pretty easy targets (Modern Warfare, Big Brother, Radiohead) with cult followings, which isn’t hard.

It’s the way they articulate their distaste of something. I think Swells once called Los Campensinos a ‘fourteen legged walking abortion,’ now I like LC and I still managed to find this assessment amusing, the same way I do when Brooker talks about his disdain for football, even though I’m an avid football fan.

If you don’t like his columns then don’t read them, I can’t see why this seems to count the television show, which I assume was worked on by other people then Brooker. It’s a bit unfair on them, isn’t it, to trash a show because you don’t like the creator?

You know, maybe you could take a page from his book. If you’d managed to explain why you don’t like the show a little bit better (something that’s his forte) I’d have enjoyed the article a bit more.
12:33 PM on 12/06/2011
He has become what he hates, namely, dull, vulgar, leering, anti-intellectual, pseudo-intellectual, pointless cynic, clubby hanger-on at the BEEB, out of the box would-be anarchist but really totally tedious conformist.

BORING.
01:33 PM on 12/08/2011
Well said eric14, though you missed out smug
02:03 PM on 12/08/2011
You are so right. That should have been top of the list. Feel smug. i am desolate.
10:49 AM on 12/06/2011
I've had the great good fortune to see the second episode already and, by contrast, it is full of heart, a sweet and tender story, haunting, melancholic and beautiful - as well as satirising our obsession with TV talent shows, reality TV etc (easy targets, I grant you). Also, Daniel Kaluuya (from The Fades) and Jessica Brown-Findlay (from Downton Abbey) are just brilliant in it...