Last night saw the airing of Charlie Brooker's National Anthem, the first installment of his Channel 4 three-part comic drama Black Mirror. The story takes place over one day and focuses on the online hivemind reaction as a fictitious princess is kidnapped. Her captors have only one demand, that the Prime Minister have sex with a pig on national television. What aimed to be an examination of the "darker side of our gadget addiction" disappointingly and predictably just ended up as Brooker telling us yet again how thick we, the general public, all are.
I didn't have high hopes. Of late I've avoided Brooker. I find it's not the best way to start Monday, reading about why I am such a sniveling moron. A moron for enjoying a Christmas advert. A moron for going to Glastonbury. A moron for not watching television in the "correct" aspect ratio.
I am a fan of Brooker and he is an undoubtedly brilliant and skilled writer but as the years have gone on he has become more and more genuinely misanthropic. The same drum banged a thousand times. "You are all stupid." There's a limit to how many times I can be told.
National Anthem was not all bad. It was compelling from the start and kept a good pace throughout. The actors, especially Rory Kinnear as Prime Minister Michael Callow, were committed in spite of such a far-fetched plot. During one scene where the Prime Ministers press team are assessing how far the story has leaked, the line "The Guardian are running a f**king live blog and a short think piece on the historical symbolism of the pig," is reason alone for me to give it another chance next week.
Despite the unsubtle premise it did have elements of realism. An inconceivable idea, that over an hour became almost believable. Yes, a programme about the prime minister shagging a pig, had elements of realism. We've all seen the Twitter mob in action and the power of social media in shaping world events. We've all probably been part of the Twitter mob and uncomfortably questioned what our over-excited ramblings have done.
Part of the appeal of the "Cult of Brooker" has always been, from Nathan Barley to his columns on reality TV, that we join in, mocking the subjects, foolishly thinking we are in someway above it. We feel better that we aren't the idiots depicted or part of an enlightened gang now we've seen the error of our ways. But it's wearing thin and predictable. I long for the day he attempts something new.
Despite the better elements of National Anthem I couldn't get away from that lingering undercurrent. The notion that the general public is terrible. Unlike the fantastic Dead Set, Charlie Brooker takes an altogether more sneering tone at the faceless public as a whole.
Naturally, like the idiots we are, we all took to Twitter to discuss it. It was depraved, genius and dark according to the hashtag. I couldn't see it. It wasn't revolting, it wasn't that shocking, it was exactly what I've come to expect from Brooker.
Follow Fran Singh on Twitter: www.twitter.com/fransingh
Sam Parker: Black Mirror 'White Bear' (REVIEW)
Philip Larkin: Social Media Holding a 'Black Mirror' Up to Nature
Paddy Duffy: The Great John Lewis Debate: It's Just an Ad for God's Sake - But It's a Lovely One.
Carrie Lloyd: Please...No More Reality TV Shows - Car Crash Style
Charlie Brooker's Black Mirror launches with almost 1.9m viewers ...
TV review: Black Mirror; Mark Zuckerberg: Inside Facebook; and The ...
Black Mirror, Channel 4, review - Telegraph
Charlie Brooker's Black Mirror: Eeerie, Scary And Ludicrously True ...
Charlie Brookers new TV Series "Black Mirror"
Charlie Brooker Talks To Us About Black Mirror, Twitter And The ...
As a discussion of what people, given the chance, would be willing to watch, I think the director has a poor grasp of history. We used to take a picnic to public hangings and watch them like a day out with the family. Our appetite for witnessing the obscene isn't new. It's always been like this.
There was, however, one brilliant idea in the piece, voiced by the PM's wife: she says "They've already all imagined you doing it."
This statement actually did have some depth. Because beneath it is the question of how blithely we are willing to destroy our own institutions.
Somewhere, there is a better writer with a far cleverer story with which to explore that question.
Funny how your reaction to his is like a really really bad knock-off - say 4th generation albanian Gucci - of his style. You had to try to be like him to complain.
As with the 'aspect ratio' thing, you are aware Brooker works in television production and direction? I don't even work in TV and it bothers me, so someone working first-hand with it will obviously get annoyed by a show being shown the incorrect way.
I’ve always thought with Brooker, like Yatzhee or Stephen Wells, you don’t get the laugh from what they’re insulting as they usually go for pretty easy targets (Modern Warfare, Big Brother, Radiohead) with cult followings, which isn’t hard.
It’s the way they articulate their distaste of something. I think Swells once called Los Campensinos a ‘fourteen legged walking abortion,’ now I like LC and I still managed to find this assessment amusing, the same way I do when Brooker talks about his disdain for football, even though I’m an avid football fan.
If you don’t like his columns then don’t read them, I can’t see why this seems to count the television show, which I assume was worked on by other people then Brooker. It’s a bit unfair on them, isn’t it, to trash a show because you don’t like the creator?
You know, maybe you could take a page from his book. If you’d managed to explain why you don’t like the show a little bit better (something that’s his forte) I’d have enjoyed the article a bit more.
BORING.