Snowden Leaks 'Most Catastrophic Loss To British Intelligence Ever', Says Former GCHQ Chief

'Most Catastrophic Loss To British Intelligence Ever'

Leaked details of security surveillance programmes by whistleblower Edward Snowden have been the "most catastrophic loss to British intelligence ever", a senior Whitehall security expert has said. Sir David Omand, the former head of GCHQ who was once homeland security adviser to Number 10, said the leak of tens of thousands of files by the former US intelligence operative eclipsed the Cambridge spy ring, which saw five university students recruited as Soviet spies.

"You have to distinguish between the original whistleblowing intent to get a debate going, which is a responsible thing to do, and the stealing of 58,000 top-secret British security documents and who knows how many American documents, which is seriously, seriously damaging," he said. "The assumption the experts are working on is that all that information or almost all of it will now be in the hands of Moscow and Beijing. It's the most catastrophic loss to British intelligence ever, much worse than Burgess and Maclean in the 1950s."

Snowden, who is wanted by US authorities, is currently in asylum in Russia

Donald Duart Maclean and Guy Burgess were among five people who passed information to the Soviet Union during the Second World War and at least into the early 1950s. Snowden, who is in Russia, leaked information to the Guardian in May that revealed mass surveillance programmes such as the US National Security Agency (NSA) run Prism and the GCHQ-operated Tempora. Under the £1 billion Tempora operation, Cheltenham-based GCHQ is understood to have secretly accessed fibre-optic cables carrying huge amounts of internet and communications data and shared the information with the NSA.

The Guardian has defended publishing the revelations as Tory MP Julian Smith demanded Government clarification that the newspaper has not broken the law by sending detailed personal information about British spies across borders. Sir David told the Times that newspapers were not well placed to judge the security implications of information they published.

"That was a straightforward revelation of detail of an intelligence technique which should have remained secret," he said.

Meanwhile, Nick Clegg is reportedly to consider how to update the legal oversight of Britain's security services following concerns that powerful new technologies appear to have outstripped the current system. According to the Guardian, aides to the Deputy Prime Minister have said he would be calling on experts to discuss the implications of new surveillance technologies for public accountability and trust.

Speaking on his weekly radio phone-in on LBC 97.3 yesterday, Clegg said: "I think there is a totally legitimate debate to be had - and my experience speaking to people in the intelligence agencies is they recognise this - about the use of these new, incredibly powerful technologies.

"We have regulations that were designed for an age which is quite different now. Both terrorists and states and security agencies now conduct this battle online in a way that was unimaginable just a few years ago."


What's Hot