Benefits Cap 'Not Saving Money', Report Finds

So How Much Money Does A Benefits Cap Actually Save?
File photo dated 18/03/13 of money as a sterling slump against the euro will mean less spending money for British families going on holiday over the half-term period, according to a Post Office Travel Money survey.
File photo dated 18/03/13 of money as a sterling slump against the euro will mean less spending money for British families going on holiday over the half-term period, according to a Post Office Travel Money survey.
PA

The Government's benefits cap will struggle to meet its objectives of saving taxpayers' money and encouraging people into work, a report has found.

The Chartered Institute of Housing studied the results of the cap in Haringey, one of four London boroughs chosen as pilot areas for the scheme.

It found that 747 households saw their benefits cut between April 15 and August 16 because they were above the cap threshold.

The report found that just 10% - 74 of the households affected by the cap - were able to find work to avoid their benefits being cut, while 11 households increased their working hours to avoid the cap.

Almost 50% claimed extra payments from the council to help them pay their rent, which the CIH said "both shunts costs between national and local government budgets and masks the true impact of the cap until those discretionary payments run out".

The amount lost by the households hit by the cap ranged from 15p to £374.50 a week, the CIH said, with 51% of claimants losing £50 to £199 a week.

About 2,300 children were affected by the cap, with larger families experiencing the highest loss.

The cap, which was rolled out across the country from July, limits benefits that people can receive to £500 a week for families with children or £350 a week for those without children.

The report said that while the cap is changing attitudes towards employment, "for many claimants there remain significant barriers to finding work, including the lack of job seeking skills and affordable childcare".

It also found that marginalised people in society were disproportionately affected by the cap, that wider welfare reforms such as the council tax reduction scheme had hit at the same time and further reduced household incomes, and benefits claimants needed intense support to help them respond to the cap and move into work, which fall upon local authorities.

Grainia Long, chief executive of the CIH, said: "The Government said the benefit cap would save money and encourage people into work, but this report shows it is far from achieving both of those aims in one of the worst affected areas.

"There have been whispers that the Government is considering lowering the cap or increasing the amount of hours people must work to avoid it. Unless ministers commit to increasing support for people looking to get back into work and funding for childcare this would be very dangerous.

"Ultimately, the Government must do more to tackle the UK's housing crisis. The reason that the housing benefit bill is so high and that so many people are affected by the benefit cap is that we are simply not building enough homes to accommodate our growing population."

Claire Kober, leader of Haringey Council said: "This research shows that the benefit cap has failed in its main objectives.

"Only a few households have been able to get back into work and, while the government may be making some savings, the real costs are just being passed to local councils already under enormous financial pressure.

"People still need a lot of support to get training or back into work and spiralling housing costs mean there is a long way to go before anyone could claim the benefit cap is working."

The cap covers the main out-of-work benefits - Jobseeker's Allowance, Income Support, and Employment and Support Allowance - and other benefits such as Housing Benefit, Child Benefit and Child Tax Credit and Carer's Allowance.

Close

What's Hot