NEWS
30/04/2019 07:37 BST | Updated 30/04/2019 08:02 BST

Cambridge University To Investigate How It Profited From The Slave Trade

"The wounds of that period still reverberate today."

A decision by the University of Cambridge to investigate how it benefited and contributed to the slave trade has been met with praise.

Cambridge said a rigorous two-year inquiry will seek to “acknowledge its role during that dark phase of human history” by uncovering the ways it profited from slavery and forced labour during the colonial era through donations, gifts and bequests.

It will also examine the extent to which Cambridge scholars promoted race-based attitudes which helped shape public and political opinion.

Labour MP David Lammy commended the prestigious institution, saying “contrition and atonement for of a grievous wrong is the only way to face the future.”

 

 

Two post-doctoral researchers are to conduct the investigation, poring over both university archives and wider records.

It comes amid a wider “decolonise” movement sweeping universities in both Britain and the US in recent years.

Oriel College at Oxford University decided to keep its statue of British imperialist Cecil Rhodes in 2016 despite widespread student demands to remove it.

UK student campaigners from the Rhodes Must Fall group argued the row illustrated Britain’s “imperial blind spot”.

Professor Stephen Toope, University of Cambridge vice-chancellor, said: “There is growing public and academic interest in the links between the older British universities and the slave trade, and it is only right that Cambridge should look into its own exposure to the profits of coerced labour during the colonial period.

“We cannot change the past, but nor should we seek to hide from it. I hope this process will help the University understand and acknowledge its role during that dark phase of human history.”

Labour MEP Andrew Adonis asked: “Are they returning the money? If so, to whom and how much?”

 

The final report is expected to “recommend appropriate ways for the university to publicly acknowledge such links and their modern impact”, the university said.

Professor Martin Millett, chairing the advisory group overseeing the work, added: “We cannot know at this stage what exactly it will find but it is reasonable to assume that, like many large British institutions during the colonial era, the University will have benefited directly or indirectly from, and contributed to, the practices of the time.”

The findings are expected to be submitted in 2021.