House Of Lords Inflicts 5 Defeats On Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda Bill

The setbacks to the plan to help “stop the boats” paves the way for a game of parliamentary “ping-pong”.
The House of Lords (left) and home secretary James Cleverly and Rwandan minister of foreign affairs Vincent Biruta signing a new treaty in Kigali, Rwanda in December.
The House of Lords (left) and home secretary James Cleverly and Rwandan minister of foreign affairs Vincent Biruta signing a new treaty in Kigali, Rwanda in December.
AP

The House of Lords has inflicted five defeats on the government over its controversial Rwanda scheme.

In another headache for Rishi Sunak, the unelected upper chamber voted by a majority of 102 to back a move to ensure the proposed legislation is fully compliant with domestic and international law.

The first defeat on the Safety of Rwanda Bill was followed by four more – including insisting parliament cannot declare Rwanda to be a safe country until the treaty with its promised safeguards is fully implemented, and a vote in favour of establishing a monitoring mechanism for the UK-Rwanda pact.

It paves the way for a back-and-forth between the elected Commons and the Lords, which is often referred to as parliamentary “ping-pong”, meaning MPs can overturn the changes at later stages in the process.

Baron Tugendhat, "The Conservative government is behaving like the ruling party in George Orwell's 1984"

"Normally 1984 is invoked in relation to gov behaviour, laws, events, in tyranies and dictatorships. Never-the-less in this bill it is seeking to achieve by act of Parliament… pic.twitter.com/dvRcsNqPVX

— Farrukh (@implausibleblog) March 4, 2024

The Safety of Rwanda Bill is designed to overcome legal challenges to past attempts to send asylum seekers with a one-way ticket to the east African country.

The bill would compel judges to regard Rwanda as safe, and give ministers the power to ignore emergency injunctions.

The policy is central to the prime minister’s hopes of convincing voters he can “stop the boats” crossing the English channel.

The government hopes once the bill passes flights will be able to take off by the spring, but that timetable now looks in disarray.

Dick Newby, Liberal Democrat leader in the Lords, said: “For months this Conservative government has been pushing this policy that does nothing to solve the asylum backlog.

“This bill has cost hundreds of millions of pounds, and doesn’t combat dangerous Channel crossings or create safe, legal routes.

“By declaring Rwanda safe when it is clearly anything but, and excluding the courts, the bill also undermines the rule of law. It is the product of a morally and politically bankrupt government.”

Speaking in the Lords, Conservative grandee Lord Tugendhat, whose nephew is security minister Tom Tugendhat, accused the government of behaving like the ruling party in George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984.

“This country is no dictatorship, it is a democracy,” he said. “If this bill goes onto the statute book in its present form, Rwanda will be a safe country regardless of reality until the statute is repealed.”

This is a breaking news story and will be updated. Follow HuffPost UK on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

Close

What's Hot