Four-Year-Olds Should Be Taught About Religion, Says Education Council Representing Faith Groups

Should Four-Year-Olds Be Taught About Religion?
Should 4-year-olds learn about God?
Should 4-year-olds learn about God?

The Religious Education Council for England and Wales, which represents around 60 faith groups, has called for children as young a four to learn about religious beliefs, while older children should be taught to discuss some of the more esoteric philosophical teasers such as ‘does God exist?’ and ‘where did the universe come from?’.

The study also suggests that primary school children should visit places of worship, such as churches, mosques and synagogues. The plan to re-energise the teaching of religious education comes only a week after Ofsted published a report indicating that less than half of the schools in England provide satisfactory religious instruction, despite the fact that the teaching of RE is compulsory within the English educational system.

The Ofsted report suggests that the decline in RE is in part due to the lack of an agreed syllabus, which means the curriculum for the teaching of religious education is often left to local councils.

The Council‘s report suggests that as soon as children attend primary school they should "encounter religions and world views through special people, books times, places and objects and by visiting places of worship," while older children should be taught about religious festivals, religious symbols and morality leading on to some of the more fundamental questions pertaining to faith.

More from the Press Association:

The report adds that youngsters should listen to stories, use "all their senses" to explore beliefs, ask questions and reflect on their own feelings and experiences. Between the ages of five and seven, RE lessons should include topics such as learning about different festivals like Easter and Diwali, different religious symbols and actions, and to how retell and suggest meanings for religious and moral stories.

The guidance says that between seven and 11 RE could include classes on discussing and presenting views on challenging questions. As an example, it says pupils could "discuss different perspectives on questions about the beginnings of life on Earth, so that they can describe different ways science and religions treat questions of origins".

In secondary school, pupils should "extend and deepen their knowledge and understanding of a range of religions and world views," the Council says. Council chair John Keast said the new guidance was an "important step in securing the future of RE in our schools".

"Some schools boast good and outstanding RE, yet many cannot," he said. "In recent years RE has fallen into a vacuum. Falling back on the safety net of statutory provision is not enough to ensure consistent high standards, strong teaching, adequate examination provision and clarity on what the subject covers.

Having a thoroughly reconsidered national curriculum framework is a means of changing both practice and attitudes to RE." Ofsted's report, published earlier this month, found that RE is being ''squeezed out'' by other subjects - leaving youngsters with little knowledge and understanding of different faiths.

Schools are confused about the reasons for studying RE, the watchdog said, adding its inspectors had also found low standards in the subject, poor teaching and problems with the way it is tested. In July, Education Secretary Michael Gove admitted that RE has suffered as a result of the Government's school reforms.

At a Church of England seminar, Reverend John Pritchard, the Bishop of Oxford, said that the move to leave RE out of the English Baccalaureate, alongside other reforms such as halving specialist RE teacher training places and a lack of bursaries for trainees, had ''been quite demoralising'' for the RE community.

Gove said that because RE has a ''special status'' in the curriculum he had believed it was protected. ''I think, if I'm being honest, over the last three years I've thought 'well that's protection enough' and therefore I've concentrated on other areas and therefore I think RE has suffered as a result of my belief that the protection that it had in the curriculum was sufficient, and I don't think that I've done enough,'' he said.

In a foreword to the report he said the review "demonstrates a commitment to raising expectations and standards of the RE received by all children and young people". He wrote: "All children need to acquire core knowledge and understanding of the beliefs and practices of the religions and world views which not only shape their history and culture but which guide their own development."

The Accord Coalition for Inclusive Education said it was disappointed that the review had not made an outright call for RE to be made part of the national curriculum. Accord Chair, Rabbi Dr Jonathan Romain, said: 'Unless this happens, RE will always suffer, with community schools varying in what they cover according to the whims of the local SACRE, while faith schools can teach one faith only to the exclusion of all others. RE needs to change from a Cinderella subject and be recognised for its importance both as a matter of general knowledge and as an aid to social cohesion as children and young people emerge into a diverse society."

Ed Pawson, chair of the NATRE, the subject association for RE said: 'NATRE welcomes the publication of the RE Review, containing a new national curriculum statement for RE to parallel recently published National Curriculum documents for other subjects. It is a great achievement that, with no access to government funding, this process, led by the Religious Education Council, has come to fruition.

"This curriculum framework sets out a clear, well-articulated structure, suitable to guide RE teaching from early years through to the end of key stage 3, creating challenging and stimulating learning opportunities for all."

Before You Go