NEWS
14/02/2021 14:19 GMT

Coronavirus May Not Have Emerged In China, WHO Scientists Says

Professor John Watson also said the possibility that it may have escaped from a laboratory had not been "ruled out".

The virus which causes Covid-19 may not have made the leap from animals to humans in China, a leading scientist has said.

Professor John Watson, part of the World Health Organisation (WHO) team that travelled to recently China to investigate the origins of the pandemic, said he could not be sure the event occurred within the country’s borders.

Speaking to the BBC One’s The Andrew Marr Show on Sunday, he said the pandemic most likely started with an infection in an “animal reservoir” which was then passed on to humans through an “intermediate host”.

Asked if he could be sure this occurred in China, Prof Watson, who previously served as England’s deputy chief medical officer until 2017, said “no”.

He said: “I think that there are all sorts of reasons to do with the way it did start in the outbreak in Wuhan and the various bits of information about the way in which these viruses live in different animal reservoirs, that suggest that China is a very, very possible source for the outbreak, but by no means necessarily the place where the leap from animals to humans took place.

“And I think we need to ensure that we are looking beyond the borders of China, as well as within China.”

ASSOCIATED PRESS
A worker in protective overall passes by a warehouse at the Baishazhou wholesale market during a visit by the World Health Organisation on the third day of field visit in Wuhan in central China's Hubei province last month.

Concerns have been raised about the WHO team’s access to vital data from the Chinese government.

US national security adviser Jake Sullivan said on Friday that Washington had “deep concerns about the way in which the early findings of the Covid-19 investigation were communicated and questions about the process used to reach them”.

Meanwhile, foreign secretary Dominic Raab said the UK shared “concerns” that scientists would “get full co-operation and they get the answers they need”.

Asked if the WHO team was given access to the raw data about the first 174 people who contracted coronavirus in China, Prof Watson said they saw a “great deal” of information about the cases.

However, he added that the team was only given access to a “certain amount” of the raw data.

Prof Watson said: “We didn’t see all of that and we didn’t see the original questionnaires that were used, but apart from the fact that, of course, they would have been in Chinese, one has to think about what one would have seen if one had gone to any other country in the world.”

He said the team’s visit was not a “one-off” and that the WHO sees it as “the start of a process that’s going to take really quite a while”.

The team had requested raw patient data on 174 cases that China had identified from the early phase of the outbreak in the city of Wuhan in December 2019, as well as other cases, but were only provided with a summary, said Dominic Dwyer, an Australian infectious diseases expert who is also a member of the team.

Such raw data is known as “line listings”, he said, and would typically be anonymised but contain details such as what questions were asked of individual patients, their responses and how their responses were analysed.

“That’s standard practice for an outbreak investigation,” he told Reuters on Saturday via video call from Sydney, where he is currently undergoing quarantine.

China has faced claims that the Wuhan Institute of Virology could be the suspected source of the Covid-19 virus.

However, the WHO team concluded it was “extremely unlikely” to have entered the human population as a result of a laboratory-related incident.

Prof Watson said the possibility that it may have escaped from a laboratory had not been “ruled out”.

Raab told the Andrew Marr Show that the UK Government would be “pushing” for China to provide full access to its data.

He said: “We’ll be pushing for it to have full access, get all the data it needs to be able to answer the questions that I think most people want to hear answered around the outbreak, the causes.

“And that’s important, not for geopolitical point-scoring or anything like that, but so we can learn the lessons and prevent it ever happening again.”