Cameron Urged To Protect NHS In Controversial TTIP Trade Deal

This Secret Trade Deal May Open Up The NHS To Profit-Making US Firms
|
Open Image Modal
EU chief negotiator Ignacio Garcia Bercero (R) and US chief negotiator Dan Mullaney (L) pose on March 10,2014 at the EU Headquarters in Brussels. A fourth round of EU-US trade talks will kick off in Brussels to day. The talks will help pave the way for a future trade and investment deal, known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, or TTIP. Negotiators will discuss different aspects of the agreement, including trade in services, public procurement, rules of origin, technical barr
GEORGES GOBET via Getty Images

Most voters in key battleground constituencies want David Cameron to protect the NHS from a new trade deal which campaigners claim threatens privatisation of health services, a new survey has found.

More than two-thirds opposed the inclusion of the NHS in negotiations over the Transatlatic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), a poll of more than 2,600 adults in 13 marginal Conservative constituencies for the Unite union showed.

Critics warn that the trade deal is being negotiated behind closed doors of the European Commission between EU bureaucrats and delegates from the United States.

9 Problems You Didn't Know About The TTIP US-EU Deal
The UK could be sued for risking company profits (01 of09)
Open Image Modal
Thanks to the proposed deal's "Investor State Dispute Settlement", companies will be able to sue governments whose regulations put future profits at risk. So fracking firms could take the government to court banning risky drilling, or private healthcare providers suing a government which protects the NHS.
The UK could be forced to adopt other countries' rules(02 of09)
Open Image Modal
In order to trade under the TTIP, the UK could be forced to accept rules from other countries - which doesn't bode well for people complaining about the UK having too many laws from Brussels.
Your wages will suffer(03 of09)
Open Image Modal
Unions are concerned that the weakened regulations will allow bosses to reduce wages and labour rights will suffer.
Our food regulations could be watered down (04 of09)
Open Image Modal
So far so bureaucratic, but what could this mean? Thanks to the equalization of rules between the US and EU as part of the deal, the UK could be forced to relax regulations which could see the return of banned food products in Europe like chicken bleached with chlorine and growth hormones in beef.
Our environmental standards could be undermined(05 of09)
Open Image Modal
In order to match US standards, UK could be forced to reverse its ban on asbestos - which has been linked to lung cancer and mesothelioma.
Your data could be at risk(06 of09)
Open Image Modal
US citizens do not have the same level of protection for their private data as EU citizens, so e-commerce provisions under the deal could see the safety of your private data put at risk.
Experts say the deal's benefits are "vastly overblown" (07 of09)
Open Image Modal
“An impartial reading of these key documents relating to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership shows quite clearly that these huge figures are vastly overblown and deeply flawed,” said political scientist Dr Siles-Brügge of Manchester University.
We're in the dark about much of the deal(08 of09)
Open Image Modal
Parts of the deal will only be unveiled once they're finally agreed by European Commission and US officials.
And you can do little to stop it (09 of09)
Open Image Modal
The deal is being thrashed out in secret by few people you've actually elected. Green Party MEP Keith Taylor tells HuffPostUK: "Even my colleagues who sit on the European Parliament's Trade Committee don't get a proper look at the negotiating document, and most MEPs don't get any say on the deal until we're presented it as a fait accompli.

Unite general secretary Len McCluskey said: "The Tories' Health Act of 2012 opened our NHS up to profit-making US private firms and a new trade deal threatens to make the sell-off permanent. It's clear from this poll that the NHS is going to be a major issue at next year's election.

"The results prove that people firmly oppose the inclusion of the NHS as part of the trade deal. A majority of people even think that David Cameron should use Britain's veto.

"David Cameron's silence is deafening. He is refusing to answer a very simple question: Are we going to exempt health from the EU US trade agreement?

"Unless he acts, the NHS will be at the mercy of US companies and Wall Street investors who will be able to sue the Government in secret courts if it tries to reverse privatisation."

Damian Lyons Lowe, chief executive of Survation which conducted the survey, said: "When the potential implications of this trade deal are put to voters, they are clear that protecting the NHS is of paramount importance, notwithstanding the benefits of a trading partnership.

"As this poll shows, healthcare is an issue that cuts across political divides and so may prove critical to MPs in marginal constituencies sitting on very small majorities. Should public awareness become widespread, this could, based on our polling, become an electoral liability for David Cameron if he does not heed public concerns."

The constituencies where the polling was held were Amber Valley, North Warwickshire, Broxtowe, Lancaster & Fleetwood, Brighton Kemptown, Lincoln, Morecambe & Lunesdale, Sherwood, Thurrock, Cannock Chase, West Dorset, Camborne & Redruth, and Truro & Falmouth.

The government denied that any deal would lead to the privatisation of the NHS and insisted it would create jobs.

A Department of Health spokesman said: "We have no intention of allowing the TTIP to dictate the opening up of NHS services to further competition; and it will not do so. The NHS will always be free at the point of use for everyone who needs it."

Syed Kamall, leader of the Conservatives in the European Parliament, poured scorn on the "myths' surrounding the TTIP negotiations.

Blogging on the Huffington Post UK, he wrote: "If the TTIP negotiations cover issues other than trade, it becomes known as a "mixed agreement" and will have to be ratified by the British Parliament.

"Democratic oversight and transparency is a core shared objective of the parties and Members of the European Parliament across the political spectrum are closely monitoring the different stages of the process in order to inform our citizens and to engage them in the process."