American Apparel 'Thong Bodysuit' Advert Banned For Showing Young Girl Baring Her Buttocks

'Thong Bodysuit' Advert Has American Apparel In Hot Water Yet Again...
|

An American Apparel advert has been banned for sexualising a child, after a complaint that an ad for a 'thong bodysuit' showed a girl baring her buttocks who looked underage.

The girl model - who the one complainant said looked under 16 years old - appeared in a website ad for the clothing company's 'lips print cotton spandex sleeveless thong bodysuit'.

The "sexualised" picture is the latest in a long line of American Apparel adverts which have caused controversy, and comes six months after two of its ads were banned for sexualising schoolgirls.

Open Image Modal

A complaint said the "sexualised" girl looked under 16 years old

The bodysuit model was shown looking back at the camera over her shoulder, wearing the outfit which had a 'thong' as its lower half.

The person who complained said the advert was irresponsible and offensive for showing a sexualised image of what appeared to be a child.

The advertising watchdog, the Advertising Standards Authority, said: "A female model was featured in four images wearing the advertised product. One of the images showed her from the back with her buttocks visible."

But American Apparel hit back, saying the model was 20 years old, and that that it didn't think she looked under the age of consent.

American Apparel's UK arm said the buttocks picture was just one of four different shots of the girl in the bodysuit, and that the web page "depicted the advertised product from various angles." It added that "the image was consistent with standards contained in similar ads."

But the ASA said the ad must be removed, deciding it breached the advertising codes around "social responsibility" and "harm and offence."

Open Image Modal

The watchdog said the ad (cropped here) was "offensive"

It said in its ruling: "We considered the model had a youthful appearance and that some consumers were likely to regard her as being younger than 16 years of age.

"We considered that readers were likely to interpret the model's expression and pose as being sexual in nature. In conjunction with the youthful appearance of the model, we considered the ad could be seen to sexualise a child. We therefore concluded that the ad was irresponsible and was likely to cause serious offence."

American Apparel has become well-known for its provocative adverts, which have been frequently banned and criticised for creating suggestive undertones with young-looking women.

Last year an ad for its "back to school" range was banned for potentially normalising "predatory sexual behaviour" by using images taken up the skirts of a models wearing what looked like school uniform.

In 2013, two more racy American Apparel ads were also banned. They showed a model's lower half in thigh-high socks and a leotard, and another model wearing nothing but an oversized sweater, with her legs in the air. One person who complained said the models "appeared vulnerable" due to their skin-baring poses.

Scandals That Rocked American Apparel
Its CEO Has Been Repeatedly Accused Of Sexual Harassment(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
American Apparel CEO Dov Charney has faced multiple accusations of unwanted sexual conduct, including accusations that he forced an employee to perform oral sex and kept one employee as a sex slave. According to American Apparel spokesman Peter Schey, Charney is currently involved with four sexual harassment suits that the company believes "have no merit." Charney told CNBC that such lawsuits are "a testimony to my success." (credit:Flickr:dovcharney)
It Was Sued For Allegedly Firing A Cancer Patient(02 of10)
Open Image Modal
American Apparel was sued in 2010 for allegedly terminating an employee who was undergoing cancer treatment, CBS Los Angeles reports. The company settled the lawsuit for $60,000 in 2011, according to Daily News. Spokesman Peter Schey told HuffPost that American Apparel "agreed to intensify its training about the requirements of the Americans With Disabilities Act" following the the settlement, and now "has a policy that goes above and beyond what the law requires with regards to accommodating people with disabilities." (credit:Getty Images)
Its Employees Are Allegedly Hired And Fired Based On How Hot They Are(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
American Apparel hires workers only after taking a full-body photograph of them and has faced accusations that it only hires the best looking candidates, Gawker reports. Likewise, CEO Dov Charney reportedly personally went through photos of store employees and requested that any "ugly people" be let go, according to one store manager. For its part, American Apparel says its policy is to hire workers who are knowledgable about its products. (credit:Getty Images)
A Factory Worker Died On The Job(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
In 2011, garment worker Tuan Phan was killed by a circular knitting machine at one of American Apparel's factories. Calling the incident a "freak accident," American Apparel spokesman Peter Schey said "the company immediately took steps to avoid this type of terrible accident ever happening again," adding it is "fully committed to worker health and safety." (credit:Getty Images)
Its Been Accused Of Racism(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
American Apparel paid out over $300,000 in damages after a worker sued for being called "n****r" by his superior repeatedly, Gawker reports. The company has also been accused of profiling customers, running racist ads and making racially insensitive products. "Under no circumstances does the company think racial slurs are appropriate," Peter Schey told HuffPost. (credit:Flickr:*_*)
Its Ads Get Banned... A Lot(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
American Apparel's racy ads have been banned repeatedly for showing nudity, supposedly being exploitative and sexualizing child models. (credit:Getty Images)
It Almost Went Bankrupt(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
American Apparel has been flirting with bankruptcy since 2010, coming especially close in the spring of 2011 after losing around $86 million. Despite calls for the company to outsource production due to the financial strife, it remained committed to "domestic production, fair wages [and] positive working conditions," according to American Apparel's Peter Schey. An $80 million credit infusion from billionaire George Soros in 2012, however, appears to have put the clothing company on more solid financial footing. (credit:AP)
Its CEO Allegedly Throws Dirt At People(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
A 2012 lawsuit brought by former employee Michael Bumblis accused CEO Dov Charney of throwing dirt at a store manager and calling him a "fag" and a "wanna be Jew," The Huffington Post reports. "Dov Charney and witnesses deny that Charney ever assaulted or rubbed dirt in Mr. Bumblis's face," spokesman Peter Schey told HuffPost. "Mr. Bumblis sued only after being terminated for cause (after numerous warnings about his conduct before and after the alleged dirt-throwing incident)." (credit:Getty Images)
It Apparently Can't Take A Joke(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
In 2011, America Apparel ran a contest called "The Next Big Thing," which sought a plus-size model for its new larger line of clothing. Nancy Upton's collection of ironic photos for the contest was the popular winner but American Apparel chose not to give her the top prize because of her "attempts to discredit the positive intentions of our challenge," a spokesperson wrote at the time. (credit:Shannon Skloss Photography)
It Unknowingly Hired Unauthorized Workers(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
American Apparel was forced to fire 1,800 employees after a federal audit unveiled irregularities in the documents immigrant workers provided American Apparel in order to get hired, The New York Times reports. "We interviewed every worker one by one to ensure that we were absolutely certain that we didn't terminate anyone who had a right to be here," American Apparel's Peter Schey told HuffPost. (credit:Getty Images)