David Cameron's Immigration Cap Blasted By IoD As 'Bizarre And Unachievable'

Cutting Benefits For Migrants Could 'Punish' UK Businesses
|

Prime Minister David Cameron is "punishing business" by trying to meet his self-imposed net migration target, the influential Institute of Directors (IoD) has said.

New statistics released on Thursday by the Government reveal that net migration levels have risen to 330,000 - their highest ever point - surpassing the previous record of 320,000 from June 2005.

The total revealed today is expected to be over three times higher than the Government's target of 100,000.

But the UK's leading business association, along with two heavyweight think tanks, has rebuked David Cameron for his continued commitment to reducing net migration, insisting radical new plans to meet this threshold will damage Britain's economy.

The IoD and British Future have this week led fresh calls for a review into planned laws to stem the stream of migration - such as restricting benefits for migrants -would impact the UK's economy, culture and society.

Open Image Modal

David Cameron pledged to bring net migration down below 100,000

"Scrabbling around to find measures to hit a bizarre and unachievable migration target is no way to give British businesses the stable environment they need," Simon Walker, director general of the IoD, said.

"Combined with ministers' increasingly strong rhetoric on immigration, the UK's reputation as an open, competitive economy is under threat," he added.

Walker's calls were echoed by Sunder Katwala, director of the British Future group, who claimed the public had low trust in the Home Office to deliver its immigration goals.

"The prime minister currently has no long-term plan to meet his net migration target. It is little wonder there is such low public trust on immigration and the government's ability to manage it," he said on Thursday.

Story continues below slideshow

9 Surprising Facts About Immigration
(01 of09)
Open Image Modal
Foreign-born residents make up almost 16 percent of the 31 million-strong labour force.Of the total number of overseas workers, 60% were born outside the EU. 16% are from western Europe, while 15% are from eastern Europe. The two poorest EU countries, Romania and Bulgaria, accounted for 3.8% of workers.
(02 of09)
Open Image Modal
In fact, the British public overestimates the share of immigrants in the total population: Respondents to a poll by Ipsos MORI earlier this year guessed it was 21%. The actual figure is 13%, according to the UK's Office of National Statistics.
(03 of09)
Open Image Modal
Immigration has risen significantly in the last 20 years, spiking most recently after a decade of stability.
(04 of09)
Open Image Modal
The UK isn’t the largest EU port of call for migrants.
(05 of09)
Open Image Modal
And despite all the talk about “Polish plumbers” and Ukip leader Nigel Farage’s call to leave the EU to “regain control” over the country’s borders, most people vying to settle in Britain come from outside the trading bloc. The top two arriving nationalities are in fact Chinese and Indian.
(06 of09)
Open Image Modal
Foreign arrivals come mostly to work or study and about two-thirds of those moving for employment already have job offers when they arrive, even as politicians decry “benefit tourism.” In researcher NatCen’s British Social Attitudes Survey, taken in 2013 and published in June 2014, 24 percent of respondents said they believed welfare was the most common motive for migration when that was listed as one of the choices.
(07 of09)
Open Image Modal
While legal foreign residents are eligible for social welfare, 93% of the 5.3 million people claiming aid, such as jobseekers’ allowance and disability benefits, have British nationality.
(08 of09)
Open Image Modal
Three EU nationalities are among the top 10 benefit claimants of foreign birth.
(09 of09)
Open Image Modal
Seventy-six percent of Romanians and Bulgarians who arrived in the U.K. last year came for work. That compares with 61% of people from the original 15 EU members and 67% of people from the eight eastern European countries that joined the bloc in 2004. Popular perceptions are different: In a report analyzing language used by 19 British national newspapers in the two years preceding the lifting of a seven-year ban on employment, Oxford University’s Migration Observatory said that words used to describe Romanians frequently evoked crime and anti-social behavior, especially in the tabloid press.

"Responding to each damaging set of immigration figures with new ad-hoc policies is no way to manage such an important issue," Katwala said.

"A comprehensive immigration review would set out what's possible and what isn't. It could also give the public more of a say in what happens - providing impartial facts about the impacts of different policies on the economy, society and public services."

David Cameron has announced a raft of proposals intended to cut the annual net migration figure, which include stopping benefit payouts to Europeans for their first four years of residency in Britain, offering up an EU referendum before 2017 and pledging to abolish the Human Rights Act to ease extradition processes.

In July the Home Secretary, Theresa May, said the Conservatives had set a new target to cut net migration below 100,000 by 2020.