Bollywood's Deafening Silence During 'Padmaavat' Controversy

"I suggested that the team keep quiet," says star Shah Rukh Khan, calling out "outrage" addicts.
Open Image Modal
Bollywood actor Shah Rukh Khan speaks during an interview with Reuters in Mumbai, India, January 18, 2017. REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui
Danish Siddiqui / Reuters

While Sanjay Leela Bhansali's historical-fiction, Padmaavat, was being attacked by fringe groups, mainly the Karni Sena, the Hindi film industry maintained a stoic silence around the issue.

Bollywood's perceived lack of unity was interpreted as cowardice, with many writing op-ed pieces calling out the divisive nature of the industry members.

On Monday evening, Shah Rukh Khan was present at the Magnetic Maharashtra event, held at BKC's MMRDA grounds in Mumbai, where he was in conversation with Arnab Goswami, producer Ritesh Sidhwani, Amazon Prime Video India head, Vijay Subramaniyam, Viacom Group Head, Sudhanshu Vats, and Lokmat Editorial MD, Rishi Darda.

When the question of the industry's response to Padmaavat came up, SRK addressed it head-on. "Recently with the Viacom film (Padmaavat) we had people saying 'why don't the other stars come up, they are not coming up, oh they are hiding.' No, we are not hiding. As a matter of fact, the simple truth is this – there is a section of people who go on an 'uprising' so to say."

Khan said talking about the issue would give it more 'importance.'

He further added, "If more prominent actors, actresses, and directors came and talked about this film—as a matter of fact, many times I suggested to their team, not to talk about this, just keep quiet because you are giving wind to fire. And suddenly these people are getting more recognized by the virtue of being on all the news channels. So don't give them importance."

Preempting the question that there is a culture of fear perpetuated by the country's majoritarian politics, Khan said, "Nobody is scared or fearful as is said about Bollywood stars, 'oh these people just want to earn money and not do anything for the society.' No. We love our society. We make entertaining films for the society. And as a 52-year-old father, I want you to come to the theater safe and sound with your child and happily go, even if you don't like the film. The experience should be fantastic. That's my responsibility. So the hurtfulness is not because 'I am worried about my film' but I am worried about that girl watching the film."

The superstar, who'll next be seen as a vertically-challenged character in Aanand L Rai's Zero, said that nobody can stifle the voice of an artist and that no amount of pressure can stop creative people from telling the stories they want to.

"No matter how much we stop it, break it, hide it, the ideas won't stop," he concluded.

Also see on HuffPost:

6 Times Anushka Sharma Nailed It While Speaking About Censorship
(01 of06)
Open Image Modal
Yeah… because ultimately you are making a film which is an honest rendition of something that exists in our society, and there is no glorification of anything that can be objectionable.
On being asked whether the censor troubles that NH10 went through worried her, as one of the producers of the film.
(credit:Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
(02 of06)
Open Image Modal
There is rage. And that is the other thing. Our rage doesn’t unleash itself because we follow the system – judiciary, police etc. So our rage is directed at the systems that don’t work. We all talk about freedom of speech and having opinions. But what is happening is that there is moral policing and people saying that I am so convinced about my opinion that I will be pissed off if you don’t agree with me. That is why we are talking about bans, and taking out material from films.
On why she thinks 'moral policing' occurs in India
(credit:Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
(03 of06)
Open Image Modal
I just think there is just complete lack of compassion. When you make a film and you are told to reduce the violence. What is happening in real life is much more brutal. What we are making is much milder, and then you tell us to reduce by 30 percent? What does that mean? How do you do that?
On how she feels about the Censor Board's approach to cuts.
(credit:AP)
(04 of06)
Open Image Modal
Now I know when we are reading a script or making a movie, we are going to think “Is this going to get passed?” And that’s not how you want to make movies.
On how she feels rigid censorship will affect cinema
(credit:STR/AFP/Getty Images)
(05 of06)
Open Image Modal
We are breeding a 'ban mentality'. You are irritating people to the degree that it's suffocating them. We are educated people, we know what's right and what's not. Let us think for ourselves than follow a particular ideology.
When asked to describe the current climate of censorship in India
(credit:Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
(06 of06)
Open Image Modal
Believe in the certification. It's there for a reason. Films depict what's there in reality.
On how she would like audiences to approach movies
(credit:BCCL)