Downton Abbey Movie Review: How Does It Compare To The TV Series?

After four years away from our screens, a film version of the hit ITV period drama is coming to cinemas. But is it as good as the original show?

Warning: This article contains minor spoilers for the Downton Abbey film.

It’s the film event fans have been waiting for since Christmas 2015, but the release of the much-anticipated Downton Abbey movie is finally upon us.

Four years since we last checked in with the wealthy Crawley family and their eclectic bunch of staff, there’s now a brand new chapter of their story – and with the Downton series finale getting the thumbs up from both viewers and critics, the stakes were high heading into this new film version.

As we all know, when beloved TV series are made into films, it hasn’t always been a success story, with fans often feeling their favourite shows lose their charm when they make the jump to the big screen (do we even need to mention Sex And The City 2?). Charm is one thing Downton Abbey had in spades during its original run on ITV – so is this a curse it has managed to swerve with its film incarnation?

Well, in a word, yes.

Open Image Modal
Netflix

Any Downton devotees fearful it would be ditching the trivial minutiae the show became famous for and replacing it with high-speed chases, or ditching Dame Maggie Smith’s icy one-liners in favour of shouting matches or catty remarks delivered in voiceover, can breathe a sigh of relief.

In fact – presumably down to the fact the Downton film retained its original writing and directing team – the film essentially plays out like a two-hour instalment of the period drama, with little to differentiate between the two. Whether or not that’s a compliment, of course, depends on your opinion of Downton Abbey in the first place.

The film picks up a year on from the 2015 Christmas special, and it’s very much business as usual. Mr Carson is doing his best to enjoy his retirement, Lady Mary is now running the show and Daisy is wondering whether there’s more to life than her engagement to the safe and dependable Andy and working under Mrs Patmore.

We find out almost immediately that Downton is going to be the recipient of a royal visit (a neat way of cashing in on the royal fever that so many people have felt since Harry and Meghan’s nuptials, if nothing else). Much of the film’s conflict stems from the staff’s worries they’ll be snubbed in favour of the royals’ team, and whether Irish republican Tom can keep his mouth shut long enough for the king and queen to enjoy their dinner.

Open Image Modal
Focus Features

There is one rather dramatic moment in the middle that feels like it’s mainly been included as a stunt to remind people they’re watching a film and not just a one-off TV episode. We won’t spoil the specifics, but Downton being Downton, this scene – whether intentionally or not – does come across as a bit OTT, though it’s not long before the usual silliness resumes.

Everything that was present in the original Downton is back, which, impressively, includes its entire ensemble cast. There are still plenty of perfectly-delivered bons mots from Dame Maggie Smith, who is – of course – the star of every scene she’s in, whether that’s her lamenting what a difficult task taking off one’s hat is, or sticking up for Machiavelli’s lesser-known traits. But plenty of others get their moment to shine too.

True to form, Joanne Froggatt is fantastic as Anna, rallying the Downton staff when it looks like they’re set to be left out in the cold during the royal visit. Jim Carter (Mr Carson) is worth his fee for his facial expressions alone. And thanks to the film’s longer running time, there’s also more of a chance to see another side to Barrow, with Rob James-Collier being afforded the opportunity to show some other sides to his character, who has long been accused of being pretty one-note.

Open Image Modal
Focus Features

In general though, the Downton Abbey film is very much “more of the same”, which means that for those who never watched it – or indeed actively disliked it – there’s little to rope you in this time around. Entire conversations still revolve around insignificant matters, things still move at a fairly glacial pace and, yes, there is still wealth everywhere (if this put you off first time around, then bear in mind the film revolves around a royal visit, so it’s probably best to give the whole thing a wide berth).

Still, those Downton devotees who’ve missed the show in its absence will find their patience rewarded when the house opens its famous doors one last time.

Downton Abbey hits UK cinemas on 13 September.

Film Remakes We Love To Hate
The Stepford Wives (2004)(01 of12)
Open Image Modal
Essentially everyone involved in this remake has since distanced themselves from it, including both Nicole Kidman and Matthew Broderick, while Frank Oz admitted he “f***ed up” with ‘The Stepford Wives’, which was marred by rumours of on-set fighting and several rewrites during production. (credit:Snap Stills/REX)
Planet Of The Apes (2001)(02 of12)
Open Image Modal
This bizarre shot of an ape superimposed on the Lincoln Memorial probably tells you everything you need to know, really. (credit:20th Century Fox)
Swept Away (2002)(03 of12)
Open Image Modal
Often billed as not just one of the worst remakes, but one of the worst films ever, ‘Swept Away’ is truly a low for both Madonna and her then-husband Guy Ritchie, scooping an arguably impressive (depending on how you look it) five Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Film, Worst Screen Couple and Worst Director. (credit:Screen Gems/Everett/REX)
Alfie (2004)(04 of12)
Open Image Modal
Seriously, Jude Law. What *was* it all about? (credit:Nils Jorgensen/REX)
Annie (2014)(05 of12)
Open Image Modal
Despite an all-star cast and the backing of Jay-Z and Will Smith, ‘Annie’ was savaged by critics, with Entertainment Weekly branding the soundtrack an ‘AutoTuned disaster’, although Quvenzhané Wallis was largely praised for her performance. (credit:Columbia Pictures)
The Pink Panther (2006)(06 of12)
Open Image Modal
This remake received mostly negative reviews upon its release and was deemed a rare misfire for Steve Martin, but that didn’t stop a sequel coming out - which was, of course, panned even more. (credit:Col Pics/Everett/REX)
The Wicker Man (2006)(07 of12)
Open Image Modal
While the original film is hailed as one of the scariest horrors ever, the Nicolas Cage remake is more commonly associated with the comedy genre… though we’re not sure that’s quite what the filmmakers had in mind. (credit:Snap Stills/Rex)
A Nightmare On Elm Street (2010)(08 of12)
Open Image Modal
A remake so irrelevant we didn’t actually realise it existed… most reviews of ‘A Nightmare On Elm Street’ praised the newly-updated special effects, but claimed the remake couldn’t live up to its predecessor from the 1980s. (credit:Moviestore/Rex)
The Day The Earth Stood Still (2008)(09 of12)
Open Image Modal
Heavily criticised for relying on style over substance, reviewers praised the special effects of the film, but felt that without much of a story to hold things together, it wasn’t a worthy successor to the 1950s original. (credit:Snap Stills/Rex)
House Of Wax (2005)(10 of12)
Open Image Modal
A film best known for the ‘See Paris Die!’ campaign that preceded its releasing, referring to its star, Paris Hilton. Well, at least that was a distraction from the film itself... (credit:Warner Br/Everett/REX)
The Karate Kid (2010)(11 of12)
Open Image Modal
When even the presence of God-amongst-men Jaden Smith can’t save your film, you know you’re doomed. (credit:Col Pics/Everett/REX)
Psycho (1998)(12 of12)
Open Image Modal
Even director Gus Van Sant admitted, shortly after Psycho’s release, that the shot-for-shot remake of Alfred Hitchcock’s classic had been an “experiment”, which proved that no one can copy a film in exactly the same way as the original. (credit:Universal/Everett/REX)